A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Reckoning Must Begin
Editorial Tamil Guardian
Sri Lanka cannot investigate itself - no word or deed over the coming
weeks, months and even years will change this. For over six decades
successive governments of both main parties, have failed to provide
justice for Tamils. Anti-Tamil riots, assassinations of Tamil
journalists, killings of ACF aid workers and the Trinco 5, as well as
the recently unearthed mass grave in Mannar stand as inescapable
reminders of the impunity with which anti-Tamil crimes are carried out.
Moreover, as a report published last week on impunity in Sri Lanka
notes, there are suggestions that the government may have already begun
destroying evidence on a large scale. Ultimately, the allegations of war
crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide are too serious to be
addressed through any internal inquiry. Put simply, how can Sri Lanka,
which orchestrated the mass killing of the Tamil population in the Vanni
with the silent endorsement of its wider polity, judiciary and civil
society, investigate itself? Indeed over the past five years Sri Lanka
has proved itself to be false. Its tale of zero casualties and soldiers
armed with a gun and human rights charter, now stands as a fiction that
was used to hide a horrific truth. Similarly, its present tales of
development and reconciliation, are but a façade covering a programme of
re-engineering the ethnic demography of the North-East through
militarised colonisation and a catalogue of abuses including coercive
birth control, rape, abductions and murder.
It is within this context of deepening crisis that the spotlight created
by high-profile international visits is emphatically welcomed by the
Tamil people. Personal visits to the Tamil homeland and direct
engagement with Tamil politicians and activists, have served to create
space for Tamil voices in the North-East to be aired on an international
stage. However, as the Defence Ministry’s call for Ananthi Sasitharan
to be ‘rehabilitated’, and the intimidation of Tamils who speak to
international visitors illustrates, grave risks remain. Indeed despite
the clear warning by US diplomat Nisha Biswal against intimidation of
such Tamils, a government-aligned news site vilified them as
“informants” - a sinister move that brands all Tamils engaging with the
international community as enemies of the state and thereby,
‘legitimate’ targets. As international visitors to the North-East would
have observed, the reverse is also true - their engagement with the
Tamils, earns them the ire of the Sri Lankan state. From defamatory
remarks in the Sri Lankan press, to the refusal of a visa to a US
official, Sri Lanka no longer cares to even pretend to play by the
rules. Meanwhile, international engagement with Tamils has highlighted
yet another deepening polarisation on the island: whilst Tamils call out
for yet more, Sri Lanka responds with increasing hostility and cries of
neocolonial interference.
It comes as no surprise that even when faced with intimidation, given
the slightest space to speak, Tamils in the North-East call for an
international inquiry, most recently witnessed through the passing of a
resolution at the Northern Provincial Council. Indeed despite a
prevailing tendency to decry a seeming lack of Tamil unity by pointing
to effective family squabbling, there is unanimous agreement on key
issues. Tamils across the world, whether they are situated in the
homeland, diaspora, or even Tamil Nadu, are calling for an international
investigation. Likewise however, there is an increasingly accordant
Sinhala move against such an investigation, at best calling for yet more
time to launch an internal inquiry, and at worse co-opting the
government line of defending a ‘righteous war on terror’. The UNP’s
almost hysterical criticisms against the government, are not for their
inaction over Tamil injustice, rather over the government’s failure to
stave off international scrutiny. Indeed to this end, the UNP has
consistently sought to work with the government, perversely united
against justice for the Tamil people. Equally dismaying are pleas from
Colombo civil society groups to delay an international inquiry, arguing
it would jeopardise their operative space. This ignores the fact that
for over sixty years, Colombo’s civil society has consistently failed,
whether through a lack of capability or will, to deliver justice to
Tamils. Whilst there are a notable handful of Sinhala voices that have
campaigned for justice, it is an uncomfortable truth that despite
immediate calls for an international inquiry into the military’s
shooting of three Sinhala protesters in Weliweriya, there is persistent,
overwhelming Sinhala unity on deflecting an international inquiry into
the killings of tens of thousands of Tamils.
Five years ago, as Tamils stood on the streets of world capitals,
helplessly calling on the world to act, it failed to do so. This year,
as the call for an international investigation by Tamils and non-Tamils
alike grows louder by the day, the question being asked, is will the
international community deliver justice for what it failed to prevent?
Sri Lanka’s wanton disregard for international criticism and calls to
abide by accepted norms is precisely why, now more than ever, warnings
and deadlines pinned to the UNHRC must be effected. Key member states
must make an unambiguous call for an international inquiry. Fear of
having such a motion defeated within a notoriously self-interested
circle, should not deter responsible states from putting it forward and
building support for it. Tabling a resolution calling for an
international inquiry sends a powerful message on the global stage: on
the question of crimes against the Tamil people, Sri Lanka cannot
investigate itself. It also stands as a pledge of will, which can be
pursued through multiple avenues; after all, the fight for justice was
never to end in March. Ultimately, a resolution which sanctions Sri
Lanka’s status quo, not only sanctions the Rajapaksa regime, but
emboldens other rogue states, who would not fail to see the
international community barking empty threats. The warnings must be
realised, and the reckoning must begin.
