A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, May 26, 2014
Modi’s Rajapakse problem – A humble proposal
While one may analyze if the invitation to SAARC heads of government was
necessary for the swearing in of an Indian PM, citing pros and cons for
the same, let this not be in the cost of misreading ground realities.
The present SL government led by Rajapakse is actually guilty of serious
war crimes. It cannot be denied. It is realpolitik considerations of
India, that the GOI allowed it to happen. Should it have allowed the
same is another question. For a different thread. I had predicted when
the UPA 1 came to power in an article called “Can India afford a Policy
of Drift?” and indicated the implications of impending dangers. At that
time, all one could do was to lament in some digital blog!
Coming to ground realities. My only submission to gentle readers here are:
1. Please do not have any illusions of SL joining India
in some sort of economic union even. I have visited the place and
interacted extensively with Sinhalese and Tamils. If at all there is a
consensus amongst the Sinhalese it is that they need to keep away from
India as much as they can. They will deal with anyone else but India.
The common fear is that India seeks to dominate and put down SL and
encroaches on their independence. In addition, they believe now that the
war is over, they can emerge and grow faster than India, especially if
they show their willingness to be useful to other powers who want a
presence there as a check to India.
Can this be reversed? Yes GOI can do it. It calls for a nuanced policy
of engagement on our terms. I have to wait and see if the new government
has grasped the basis for that. TN Govt, has to be taken along for it
to succeed. In Jayalalithaa, there is a person who can appreciate
national interests. But it is also important to realize that previous
GOI dispensations have not displayed a good track record of defending
Indian interests and territory when it comes to SL. They have got away
with it because it did not elicit the intense emotional connect of say a
Pakistani claim on Indian territory.
2. As long as Rajapakse government is there, and there is no “nudging”
from India, the Tamils of SL will not be served well. This much is very
clear. Rajapakse will listen if there is someone in Delhi bold enough to
make him listen. Earlier we had a PM who was not able to make his own
cabinet listen to him. Now it is different. Also, readers should
remember, it is the Tamil population of SL who have a greater
appreciation of their Indian connection and share a heritage of
following a Hindu faith. The SL Sinhala majority has a very xenophobic
strain of intolerance to Hindu way of life despite professing to
Buddhism. It is the Buddhist clergy that spearheads and gives sustenance
to such view points. That has to change from within and just like in
Pakistan, even the curriculum that is there in schools reflect these
view points. It is something that needs to be corrected with the right
kind of “inducements”.
What all this calls for is a calibrated and carefully crafted Indian approach that involves:
1. Comprehensive economic linkages between Indian and SL, especially
infrastructural and other projects on the scale of Afghan involvement in
the northern and eastern SL. It should be balanced with opportunities
for SL companies getting preferential access to Indian economy,
financial markets to make an impact on the SL economic scene. SL
companies, especially those linked to the Family (SL is totally
controlled by Rajapakse family).
2. A more wide ranging engagement with political spectrum of SL
including Wickramsinghe and the Tamil parties. The non-governmental
party to party links between leadership can allow for a greater amount
of understanding and also letting them know what is there in it for them
if they are able to work with India.
3. A clear understanding of Indian red lines that the SL leadership
should be made aware of. If those red lines are crossed, India will
react and make SL feel the hurt. Despite bravado, SL leadership and
elite are under no illusion that they can take on India. They were
emboldened because of weak leadership in us. If the leadership is strong
and is very clear about the red lines and what will happen if they are
crossed, SL will behave.
4. If we are able to have a strategy and execute it along the broad
contours stated above, then we will be in a position to have a SL in
about 10 years that will be firmly under the Indian sphere of influence.
Independent, but friendly with a stake in seeing a strong and stable
India.