A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, June 1, 2014
On Winning The Gratiaen
It is customary for the winner of the Gratiaen Prize for
Creative Writing to deliver an acceptance speech. Accordingly, on
Saturday May 24, 2014, as the recipient of the prize I addressed the
audience. In previous years, The Nationhas featured those
shortlisted for the award as well as the eventual winner. Naturally, I
excluded myself from these exercises. This time, however, for reasons
that do not require elaborate, when the Features Editor wanted
‘something’ I said I would write what I remember of my acceptance
speech. Later I realized that I might not remember everything and also
that in the rush of the moment I left out certain things I ought to have
mentioned. So in this piece I will write what I said and in italics add that which I did not but ought to have.
It occurred to me that 29 years from now, I would be just one of fifty
Gratiaen Prize winners. Now had I not won, 29 years from now (who
knows?) I might be the only one to have been shortlisted on five
occasions. I’ve submitted to the Gratiaen six times over the past seven
years. Looking back, the high point has clearly been winning the H.A.I.
Goonetilake Prize for the Best Translation, that of Simon
Navagaththegama’s Sansaaraaranyaye Dadayakkaraya. That was special because that
text is an important literary landmark and because Simon
Navagaththegama was one of the best writers in Sinhala in the second
half of the last century. It was special because of who Ian Goonetilake was. He was an adornment to the Gratiaen. Read More
Concerning Us And The “Naga”
By Darshanie Ratnawalli -June 1, 2014
Just
last week my mother shouted me down when I told her that the god
“Sakra” of the Buddhist canon was the same as the Aryan god Indra.
“Indra, the most vividly realized Vedic god, embodies the powerful Aryan
warrior…the continuing popularity of Indra, which is reflected in a
large number of tales told about the heroic deeds, and even more so
about his ability to change his shape at will, his trickery and his
sexual adventures… His fame…is still well reflected by his prominent
and active position in the Pali canon where he is called Sakka (Skt.
< Śakra).” – (pages 55, 83, Witzel and Jamison:1992[i]- full text)
I questioned her concern about Sakra:
did she perchance think that he was an integral part of Buddhism proper?
She answered, yes the Pali canon described the realities, events and
beings actually experienced by the Buddha; the Sakra whom the Buddha
actually met and conversed with was therefore integral and not some
Vedic flotsam; kindly stop holding such‘mitya dristi’.
Was she aware, I asked, of how many Vedic continuities there are in the
canon? What about the Buddha’s attitude towards women or more glaringly
his attitude towards the Asuras? According to the Pali canon, Rahu, the
Asura, listened to a sermon of the Buddha which brought enlightenment
to many in the assembly, but not to him, who, as an Asura, was unfit.
Where did she think that came from if not from Buddhism’s anchorage in
the Vedic myth pool? Read More