A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ec6f/9ec6f8fb90c47aa74435bbc86e9aad7d64411cf7" alt=""
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, July 2, 2014
Dayan Jayatilleka Skips Logic; Flies At A Tangent
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4ea9/e4ea9ef4ba3c52a47c79862ebb99be59bae8c88d" alt="Colombo Telegraph"
By Shyamon Jayasinghe -July 3, 2014
In his article published in the Colombo Telegraph of the 2nd of
July Dayan Jayatilleka (DJ) states as follows: “In a newspaper
interview, Secretary of Defense Gotabaya Rajapakse denies allegations of
any links with the BBS. He may be telling the truth.”
This assertion is a modifying statement that DJ makes after a limp,
lukewarm and covered attack on the President and the Defense
establishment over the running tragic soap opera that is the BBS. This kind of writing strategy typically shows up Dayan Jayatilleka’s ambivalence toward the Rajapaksa government. Politically
literate persons already know that there is enough evidence to lay the
blame on the President and his brother, the Defense Secretary, Gotabaya Rajapaksa. They are not stupid. In fact DJ himself earlier
in his piece makes some points that implicate the regime over this
sordid affair. Example, how the President and Defense Secretary did not
lift a finger over the whole last year when this mob went on the rampage
trampling other peoples’ human rights and grossly violating the law.
Even after Aluthgama,
we still have to see whether any investigation will take place. Two
weeks have elapsed but nothing of the sort has happened. DJ admits
Gotabaya had refrained from condemning the BBS in his recent statement.
We also know that Gota was present at the BBS AGM in Galle. A few days
ago, Gotabaya is reported to have said that there is nothing he can do
about the BBS. If the man in charge of Defense, aided by Duminda Silva
the official Ministry advisor, cannot do anything over a serious
violation of the law we need not have to tell them to resign and make
way for someone else who can do that. And, mind you, Gota is the
official war hero who won what was regarded as the unwinnable war
against terrorism; not the fearless and decisive Sarath Fonseka who was dragged and put to jail under the most barbaric and inhumane manner. All
these bits of circumstantial evidence are ample to make any morally
conscious and sensitive writer to feel a worm when asserting that
“Gotabaya may be telling the truth.”
Whitewashing Saffron Fascism
By Dayan Jayatilleka -July 2, 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4ea9/e4ea9ef4ba3c52a47c79862ebb99be59bae8c88d" alt="Colombo Telegraph"
Are the UPFA regime and the State a neutral umpire –as it should be–
between the constituent communities of Sri Lanka where all citizens are
constitutionally equal, or are they a biased (“hora”) umpire? If
the case is the latter do the rulers and state managers not know or care
that there is an ‘action replay’ at work in the international system in
the 21st century?
Do the regime and the state apparatuses under its command, including the
security services, regard violent Sinhala Buddhist extremism as a
threat to the stability of the state—as it should? Or are the regime and
state benignly neutral towards it?
Do the regime and state regard only non-Sinhalese Buddhists or
politically dissenting Sinhala Buddhists (such as the JVP, FSP, elements
of the UNP and human rights activists) as foes or potential threats,
however non-violent they may be? As the JR Jayewardene regime did with
regard to Cyril Mathew and his JSS goon squads in the early 1980s, do elements of the regime regard the BBS and its Sangha Parivar as potential allies against the JVP, FSP and student unions and trade unions led by them?
Is it that the BBS is
sought to be coddled so as to prevent its social constituency from
shifting to its more natural leader Sarath Fonseka or peeling off a
segment of the regime’s voter base?