A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Sri Lanka: Rajapaksa’s Eelam Delusion
| by Nilantha Ilangamuwa
( December 31, 2014, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) We
were all ‘happy’ when the long term civil war which nearly destroyed the
country, came to end in 2009. We all applauded despite the fact that it
left thousands of civilians dead that even today, cry out for justice.
Despite the general jubilation at the end of the war there was one man
who was not quite so happy. The war was a cause for fear that he was
happy to use to justify extra-judicial methods of law enforcement. And
with the cessation of hostilities he had to find another source of
‘fear’ to justify his means.
Of course, he never actually stated this in public but was happy to
‘suggest’ the possibility of renewed violence to grab votes. This man is
now suffering internally and no one would be surprised at any ploy he
comes up with to demoralise the public and increase the fear of the
unknown, which, he believes will gain him the votes needed to remain in
power.
He is, of course, none other than the Mr. President Mahinda Rajapaksa,
who is testing his fortunes in next month’s Presidential election in the
country, eying a third term, by calling for an early election.
However, what is emerging in the political situation in the country is
that Rajapaksa is losing his moral and ethical power. Mr. Rajapaksa is
rapidly turning into the most destructive and abusive villain of
history. There is nothing he will not do to the people of his country in
order to stay in power.
Meanwhile, a great political alliance is addressing the real issues of
the general public and turning the political discourse into a new
debate. It is making inroads in the public conscience.
Under these circumstances, defeat can be long-term relief to the President and his clan.
It was one of most important meetings that the common candidate held
yesterday morning in Mannar where he met Mannar Bishop Rt. Rev. Rayappu
Joseph, a one of outspoken priests of the Church. Because of his views
he was labeled as a national traitor who was fuelling separatism.
Despite the importance of the meeting only a few inches were given by
the local printed newspapers. Little attention was given to the
conversation and the points he raised with the common candidate.
However, one of local language newspapers, Divaina was able to
grasp the basic points in brief. In the discussion, according to the
report, the Bishop denounced the claimed which most of opponents brought
against him as an advocator of Eelam.
“I never demanded Eelam. What is the Tamil people are expecting is to live in peace and harmony with equal opportunities in the unitary state,” the bishop made an important statement before the common presidential candidate.
In his response the common candidate Mr. Maithripala Sirisena said, “My
expectation is to ensure the Sinhalese, Tamil, Muslims and all people
live with dignity under the good governance of the unitary state in our motherland”.
Those two quotations are not merely political remarks but the serious
outcome of the healthy discussion between both represents parties.
There is no doubt but this is something to brag about. In other words
this is the beginning of the healthy discourse and a line of real
reconciliation.
This is what President Rajapaksa has been blind to and actively avoided
understanding the ground reality. When a person loses contact with the
ground reality, it is only natural he will delude himself by creating
his own ‘realities’. What he has created, however, is his own personal
nightmare.
No one can deny that the Rajapaksa is having the devil dance of the end
game of abusing power. He is on the road where the leaders like Marcos,
Suhartho travelled.
However, thanks to our former leaders who created the situation in which
the President is above the law, therefore the incumbent may yet have
loopholes to avoid defeat. He has already removed the backbones of the
state institutions and he has further distorted the system to get rid of
the real battle.
Is he going to leave the office as a defeated leader or will he
attempt another “humanitarian operation” to solve the “internal
disturbance” like what the late Prime Minister Indira Gandhi did in
1975?
The answer will be delivered soon.