A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Saturday, January 31, 2015
The Juridification of Peace and the Integrity of the Judiciary
…For justice are the grand natural lawyers, and perfect judges -it is in their Souls;
It is well assorted – they have not studied for nothing- the great includes the less;
They rule on the highest grounds – they oversee all eras, states, and administrations.
It is well assorted – they have not studied for nothing- the great includes the less;
They rule on the highest grounds – they oversee all eras, states, and administrations.
The perfect judge fears nothing – he [she] could go front to front before God;
Before the perfect judge all shall stand back – life and death shall stand back – heaven and hell shall stand back. – Walt Whitman
Before the perfect judge all shall stand back – life and death shall stand back – heaven and hell shall stand back. – Walt Whitman
( January 31, 2015, Montreal, Sri Lanka Guardian) On 15 November 2011 I published an article in this journal entitled The Juridification of War and Compensation of Victims. My article was based on “Inter arma enim silent leges” – a maxim attributed to Cicero, which
translates as “in times of war, the laws are silent”. In the 21st
century, this maxim, which was purported to address the growing mob
violence and thuggery of Cicero’s time, has taken on a different and a
more complex dimension, extending from the idealistic synergy between
the executive and the judiciary in instances of civil strife, to the
overall power, called “prerogative” or “discretion” of the sovereign, to
act for the public good and the role of the judiciary as the guardian
of the rule of law.
Today, my question is “Inter Pace Silent Leges” – are the laws silent in times of peace? This would all depend on the independence and integrity of the judiciary.
“Peace” referred to hear is not just the absence of war. It is freedom
from disturbance; a state of quiet and tranquility. There could not
be lasting peace without justice.
In February 2014 the United Nations released a press statement stating
that Secretary General Ban Ki -moon had announced: “the rule of law was
at the heart of the work of the United Nations”, adding that when
public institutions failed to deliver justice or protect rights,
conflict prevailed. “People must be able to trust that their
institutions can resolve disputes promptly and fairly,” he emphasized.
At the international level, adherence to the rule of law was critical
for preventing conflict and resolving disputes peacefully. The United
Nations provided wide-ranging rule-of-law support to Governments, he
said, explaining that the Department of Peacekeeping Operations and the
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) had been designated the
global focal point for police, justice and corrections. That
arrangement had already helped efforts in Mali, Democratic Republic of
the Congo and Haiti.
On 23 August 2004, the then Secretary General of the United Nations released a report entitled The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies where he said: “Justice,
peace and democracy are not mutually exclusive objectives, but rather
mutually reinforcing imperatives. Advancing all three in fragile
post-conflict settings requires strategic planning, careful integration
and sensible sequencing of activities. Approaches focusing only on one
or another institution, or ignoring civil society or victims, will not
be effective…”
The bedrock of these three elements – justice; peace; and democracy is
the integrity of the judiciary. In 2001 the United Nations Office of
Drug Control and Crime Prevention issued a report which said that
judicial corruption was a development issue: ” Judicial corruption
appears to be a global problem. It is not restricted to a specific
country or region. Yet manifestations of corruption seem to be at their
worst in developing countries and countries in transition. According to
the Geneva-based Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, of
the 48 countries covered in its annual report for 1999, judicial
corruption waspervasive in 30 countries”.
There are countries that have issued advisory guidelines on proper
judicial conduct. For example Jamaica, in its principles of judicial
conduct (particularly applicable to the appeal courts and Supreme Court)
states: “An independent judiciary is indispensable to impartial justice
under law. Judges should therefore strive to uphold and exemplify
judicial independence in both its individual and institutional
aspects”. The Canadian Judicial Council, in its exhaustive document
“Ethical Principles for Judges” provides that judges should devote
their professional activity to judicial duties broadly defined, which
include not only presiding in court and making decisions, but other
judicial tasks essential to the court’s operation: “Judges should not
engage in conduct incompatible with the diligent discharge of judicial
duties or condone such conduct in colleagues”.
Jeffrey M. Shaman, Director of the Center for Judicial Conduct of Canada
, in his article “Judicial Ethics” indicates the power of judges in
society: “Judges are important public officials whose authority reaches
every corner of society. Judges resolve disputes between people, and
interpret and apply the law by which we live. Through that process, they
define our rights and responsibilities, determine the distribution of
vast amounts of public and private resources, and direct the actions of
officials in other branches of government”.
Independence and objectivity are the hallmark of an honourable judge.
Judge Learned Hand eloquently identified the centrality of judges to the
administration of justice in his decision in Brown v. Walter:
: “Justice does not depend upon legal dialectics so much as upon the
atmosphere of the courtroom, and that in the end depends primarily upon
the judge”. The future of individuals and society as well as the life
of persons are within the power of a judge. Such a power brings to bear
the need for ethical standards of conduct that the ordinary citizen is
not required to meet.
The Judicial Code of Kenya prescribes numerous penal sanctions for
unethical judicial behaviour. Starting from the most severe of
punishment the order is: dismissal; reduction in rank or
seniority(demotion); stoppage of increment in rank; withholding of
increment; deferment of increment; reprimand (including severe
reprimand) ; no recovery of the cost of any or part of the cost of any
loss or damage caused by default or negligence.
Integrity of the judiciary hinges upon probity, fairness, honesty, uprightness, and soundness of character.
Joseph Addison said: ” The best law in our days is that which continues
our judges during their good behaviour without leaving them to the
mercy of such who might by an undue influence trouble and pervert the
course of justice. William Rufus said “whosoever spares perjured
men, robbers, plunderers, and traitors, deprives all good men of their
peace and quietness”. Francis Bacon went along similar lines: ” A king
that setteth to sale seats of justice oppresseth the people; for he
teacheth his judges to sell justice; and “pretio parata pretio venditur
justitia” (the sale price of the bribes is justice). Judges ought to
remember that their office is “jus dicere,” and not “jus dare”; to
interpret law, and not to make law, or give law.
The author is former senior counsel and Chairman, Joint Appeals Board at the International Civil Aviation Organization.