A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, April 6, 2015
Customs Officials Demand Ransom Of Rs.120 Million – Custom Chief Wijeweera Under Fire
April 6, 2015
Appalling details of a daylight robbery committed by a group of Customs Officers under the blessings of the Customs Chief Jagath Wijeweera,
where two suspects were coerced into paying a ransom worth Rs. 120
million to prevent being detained in remand custody, has now come to
light, Colombo Telegraph can exclusively reveal today.
The Colombo Chief Magistrate was informed that DGC Wijeweera has
permitted the said group of officers to by-pass the Director of Customs
in charge of the ICT Directorate to which, the said group of officers in
question are attached and the Additional Director General of Customs
under whose purview lies the ICT Directorate, to abuse the Customs law
as they please to claim Rs. 40 million of misappropriate money among
each of them. These officers have been permitted to claim this
ill-gotten wealth through a ransom worth Rs. 120 million paid by two
suspects in remand custody, who had been threatened with an extension of
their duration in remand prison if they failed to make the demanded
payment.
It has been reported to the Magistrate that the DGC has colluded with
these officers to deceive the Colombo Chief Magistrate in order to keep
the two suspects in the remand custody with a plan to induce them to pay
the said sum of Rs. 120 million as a penalty.
This case has now been reported to the Bribery and Corruption Commission
to be investigated as the officers involved have abused the law to
misappropriate about Rs. 40 million each – which should have been
credited to the revenue according to the law – thereby committing a
violation of Secction 70 of the Bribery Act.
According to the facts submitted in the relevant customs case
(ICT/INV/014/2015) two suspects named M H H Anwar and M I A Siddick of
Janatha Garments have been produced before the Chief Magistrate Court by
the Customs Officers on 13th March 2015. They have alleged that the
company in question has abused BOI concessions to import a large volume
of fabric (over Rs. 100 million during the first three months of 2015
alone) and released them to the local market, evading the payment of
customs levies. The officers have therefore sought Court’s permission to
keep the suspects in the remand custody to conduct a ‘proper
investigation’.
However, later it had been revealed in Court that the process adopted by
the said group of officers was absolutely unlawful and the relevant
Customs Regulation issued by the Director General of Customs (DGC) with
the concurrence of the Attorney General was produced before the Chief
Magistrate. The said Directive issued under
Section 127A of the Customs Ordinance (the law that permits suspects to
be kept in remand Custody) makes it mandatory for the Head of the
respective Directorate to furnish an explicit report to the DGC, who
himself should form an opinion and inform the Magistrate, relating on
the nature of offence and the involvement of the persons requested to be
kept in the remand custody for ‘proper investigation’.
However it has now been revealed that this legal requirement has been
completely defied by the officers in question, under the full knowledge
of DGC Wijeweera, who has permitted the officers themselves- who also
have a financial interest in the case due to the cash reward they are
eyeing – to abuse the law as they please and to keep the suspects in the
remand custody for the ‘improper purpose of demanding a ransom of Rs.
120 million. This gross abuse has now been reported to the Chief
Magistrate, seeking strong case against the Customs Officers for abuse
of legal process to facilitate the collection of ransom. It has also been reported to the Corruption Commission for proper investigation.
According to the report sent to the Corruption Commission, suspects
involved in this case have been produced before the Court on 13th March
2015 with a request made by the officers themselves (not by the DGC as
law required) to keep them in the remand Custody for ‘proper
investigation’. Then, on 19th March 2015, in response to a request made
by the officers, Court has directed the Prison authorities to produce
the two suspects before the Customs ‘for the purpose of recording
further statements’.
However, it is reported that the head of the Customs Investigations
team, Deputy Director of Customs, A Lankadeva, has abused the law that
permitted Customs to keep the two suspects in the remand custody, to
coerce the suspects to pay a penalty of Rs. 60 million within a month
and thereafter to pay another Rs. 60 million if the suspects wish to be
released from the remand custody. Then he himself has conducted the
formal customs inquiry against the two suspects on 19th March 2015,
which is forbidden by law. Thereafter both suspects have been returned
to the custody of the Colombo remand prison.
The following day (20th March 2015) these officers have filed another false report before
the Colombo Magistrate Court, informing the ‘customs investigation has
been completed and therefore to release the suspects’, which is another
absolutely false statement. This report has not mentioned anything
concerning the formal customs inquiry conducted by the head of the
investigations A Lankadeva, whilst the two suspects were kept in the
remand custody, which is completely forbidden by law. In the report sent
to Corruption Commission, it is also noted that conducting of a formal
Customs Inquiry by the officer who conducted the investigation is also
an improper act, which is not permitted by law. In the report it is also
alleged that the said officer himself share one third of the penalty
recovered from the suspects as ‘cash rewards’ with the other officers,
whereas the law requires that in all cases where there is an evasion of
payment of fiscal levies, to recover the fiscal levy element unpaid in
the first place and to credit the same to the revenue.
Related posts;