A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Thursday, April 9, 2015
Sri Lanka Should Resist Beijing's Overtures
In
January, Sri Lanka’s voters kicked out President Mahinda Rajapaksa for
being corrupt, repressive, and too close to China. The country’s new
government, led by President Maithripala Sirisena, promptly drew
attention and not a little admiration for halting a Chinese-led development project, citing environmental and other problems.
The project’s fate remains unclear. What is obvious is that Beijing will
fight to retain its commercial and strategic interests in Sri
Lanka. President Sirisena was showered with promises of aid during a
visit to China in late March.
Beijing may also be close to scoring a victory on another matter to
which it attaches great importance. An unnamed Sri Lankan official
suggested that Colombo might refuse to
grant a visa to the Dalai Lama, Tibet’s spiritual leader. That’s highly
significant, given that Sri Lanka is 70% Buddhist and home to a number
of important Buddhist sites. “The Dalai Lama is very important,” the
official said, “but the close relationship with China is more important
and we have not changed our stance on ‘One China’ policy.”
Sri Lanka has a lot of things on its agenda, including long overdue
national reconciliation following its bloody civil war, accounting for
political prisoners, and establishing the rule of law. Deferring to
Beijing’s demands over the Dalai Lama might seem a small price to pay to
retain good relations with Beijing and at least some of its largesse.
It would be best for Sri Lanka’s new leaders, President Sirisena and
Prime Minister Ranil Wickeremesinghe, to take a principled line on Tibet
right from the start. Even a small country should be in charge of its
own affairs, such as who may visit, and with whom its leaders will meet.
Beijing cares desperately about how the world treats the Dalai Lama and
Tibet. Receiving him is an important moral position, but also one that
carries significant political capital. It will only become harder to
turn this policy around once IF the wrong decision is taken.
Colombo should also correct its language on Tibet policy. The statement
given by the unnamed official contained an important error. The concept
of ‘one China’ refers to the U.S. decision to agree that Taiwan -- not
Tibet -- is part of China and eventually abandon recognition for Chiang
Kai-shek’s government in Taipei, to which the Nationalist Kuomintang
(KMT) retreated in 1949.
Lodi Gyari, a former envoy of the Dalai Lama, explained why “one China”
is a misnomer when it comes to Tibet in remarks to the Council on
Foreign Relations in 2012:
No Tibetan government has ever claimed to be the government of China, so the application of the ‘one China’ policy to Tibet or for that matter, the PRC government’s ‘one China’ principle that stresses the inalienability of both Taiwan and mainland China as parts of a single ‘China’ — simply does not arise.….Yet, the PRC government vigorously pursues efforts to extend the applicability of ‘one China’ to Tibet and, in recent years, it has misled a number of governments into believing not only that the ‘one-China’ policy applies to Tibet, but that it restricts the extent to which their government officials can interact with Tibetan leaders in exile, including His Holiness the Dalai Lama. We believe that the intended effect of China’s initiative is to limit outside governments from playing a constructive role in promoting a mutually acceptable negotiated solution for Tibet. Indeed, by accepting the applicability of ‘one China’ to Tibet, governments are subtly aligning themselves with the Chinese position that the Dalai Lama is trying to ‘split’ China.
Gyari argued that foreign governments have “the duty out of self-
interest and in the interest of global peace to promote a peaceful
solution to the issue by engaging with both sides in the
conflict.” Gyari’s full remarks appear here.
There is no historic basis for applying the “One China” policy to Tibet,
and no legitimate purpose to denying the Dalai Lama a visa or refusing
to engage with representatives of the democratically elected exile
government. Speaking accurately about Tibet is necessary if there is to
be a solution to problem that Beijing created by invading it in the
1950s. However, the price to Sri Lanka of adopting Beijing’s position on
Tibet would be much higher.