A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, August 25, 2015
On Creating Our Future
- by Ranil Senanayake
- - on 08/24/2015
We have emerged, as a nation that is maturing politically and can
determine its future in a participatory, democratic manner. Now that the
process of lying out of our future has begun, the vision should never
again be left to a few individuals, but discussed widely and embarked
upon with the widest consensus. We all have to imagine, the future that
we want, for us, our children and their country. For without any
well-considered goals, there will be a perpetual journey with no
direction. Thus, a public debate as to the direction of ‘growth’ and
‘development’ must become a national obligation.
We are told that we need to invest such that economic indices such as
the GDP show growth. Development in this context is to move society to
activity that increases these indices. The current paradigm would have
us dependent on consumption as the driving factor. The more one consumes
the better the GDP. But to consume more, one must crave more, a
particular worldview driven by a pecuniary philosophy that is replacing
the more conservative spiritual philosophies the world over. It has
nothing to do with contentment, health or awareness. It is driven by
greed, desire and fear, the same values that created the problems that
we face, in the first place.
Economic development comes in many forms. The consumption patterns may
be renewable, in which case they are sustainable or non-renewable in
which case they are unsustainable. Development that relies on fossil
fuel is certainly short term and a very dangerous path. Sadly, the
growth of fossil fuel consumption has been long cherished desire among
some powerful bureaucrats with vested interests in the supply of fossil
fuels to Sri Lanka. They have even created a myth that development can
only be achieved through the consumption of fossil fuels and sold this
myth to the politicians. It is this myth of ‘development’ that has
brought us to the energy-addicted state of today and it is this same
myth that drives the ‘economic development’ vision for our tomorrow.
It was our great hope that the ‘ silly season’ of borrowing money to
construct fossil profligate projects such as Coal fired power plants;
roads to nowhere and pointless airports will be over with the dismissal
of the poorly informed. But now rumors swirl that the new lot might not
be much better. Now we hear of megapolises, bridges and energy guzzling
urban infrastructure. We are being are asked to perceive a future, like
Singapore or Dubai. Simplistic, ill-considered proposals by people who
have never understood the nature of this nation. Locked away in
air-conditioned cocoons in tall buildings or in chummy networks of
bankers and businessmen, such proposals may seem practical and perhaps
for the short-term gain of money it might be so. But they are neurotic
decisions, made with no reference to reality and will wind up hurting us
all. The German Psychologist Carl Jung, sums the situation well, “those who know nothing about nature” he states “ are of course neurotic, because they are not adapted to reality”. The more such decision makers move away from reality by abstracting nature, the more dangerous their decisions are to us.
But let us take the fossil carbon cost of Dubai and Singapore as
examples and consider what reaching for such a goal will mean to us; the
current consumption of electricity in Singapore (43.23 billion kWh),
Dubai (85.1 billion kWh) and Sri Lanka (8.927 billion kWh). Where will
this energy come from ? Has this proposed ‘development’ scenario that
seeks to make us a city-state to rival Singapore or Dubai even
considered such fundamental realities?
Whatever flows of money such an urban project is supposed to attract, it
looks like suicide in terms of climate change, not to mention becoming a
totally irresponsible member of the global community. The fossil
carbon cost of such a project attains even further staggering
proportions when the fossil carbon dioxide cost of cement (fifteen times
more than oil) is brought into the equation.
We have been a nation of wanabee’s for quite some time now. We wannabe
like Singapore, we wannabe like Dubai, why are we not satisfied with who
and what we are? The current wannabe development processes, only wants
us to be rich (in a monetary sense), not understanding the truth of the
saying “money cannot be eaten”. The cost to the individual, in terms of
personal health, social health and community stability of these mad
schemes are not considered.
The monetary system, as pointed out by innumerable people, is merely a
creation of our imagination and there is nothing that can validate it
except for a total faith in that system. Of course, the same can be
said for religion, the major difference being, that while piety drives
one, greed drives the other.
It is to this system then, that we are asked to place our faith in. The
tragedy of today is that total faith in the values of monetary system
(greed) is rapidly replacing faith in the religious (piety) and it is
the handmaidens of the monetary system who seem to control the entire
dialogue on ‘development’.
Is it not time to question this vision of ‘development’, so that the
consequences of that we are asked to place our faith in, become clearer
and we become part of the dialogue?