A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, May 29, 2016
Seeing the “Eastern Outburst” on the Sinhala canvas: In defence of Eastern Province Chief Minister
KUSAL PERERA on 05/28/2016
The
Navy high Command has taken one step too far, too quick. The Daily
Mirror (DM) on 27 May (2016), carried in one of its columns a statement
made by the Navy media spokesman, Captain Alavi as saying the Navy
Commander had given instructions to all navy officers and camps that
Chief Minister of the Eastern Province, Nazeer Ahamed should not be
allowed into any naval camp. Captain Alavi is on record saying, “We have
also informed all Navy officers to refrain from attending his
functions”.
The
Navy high Command has taken one step too far, too quick. The Daily
Mirror (DM) on 27 May (2016), carried in one of its columns a statement
made by the Navy media spokesman, Captain Alavi as saying the Navy
Commander had given instructions to all navy officers and camps that
Chief Minister of the Eastern Province, Nazeer Ahamed should not be
allowed into any naval camp. Captain Alavi is on record saying, “We have
also informed all Navy officers to refrain from attending his
functions”.
This begs the question, can the navy Commander, or for that matter any
commander in the tri-forces take such decisions against an elected
official in the capacity of an executive, a Chief Minister of a
province, whatever the issue or allegation is? The most appropriate
procedure for the Navy to take action seems, the Commander submits a
full report on the incident to the Minister of Defence through
Secretary, MoD “for necessary action”. The ministry could then request a
report from the Governor as well as from the CM before arriving at a
decision the Minister feels as necessary. Instead the navy had gone on
its own asserting an authority that I tend to think is far beyond
theirs. This is a political decision the navy had taken and I personally
feel, the navy is now treading on forbidden land. Sadly, the MS-RW
government does not have the political authority and the will to tell
the navy and the tri-forces that in a post war situation, there is a
complaint mechanism and a procedure to be adopted in civil
administration that would take care of all such issues and decisions.
That the government would ensure justice prevails for all.
The passiveness of the government in managing the battle hardened
security forces in post war Sri Lanka, is very much so due to lack of a
programme in allowing the tri forces to step back into a normal civil
society and also the bias of this political leadership towards the
Sinhala constituency. This ineptness in governance was seen in Jaffna
when Foreign Minister attended a function on developing a mechanism for
the reconciliation process. There in mid-February this year, Minister
Samaraweera ran into friction with Major General Chagi Gallage. There
was mischief in media interpretations of the incident. Yet it was most
silently sorted out, compromised on a transfer arranged for Major
General Gallage, one time head of Rajapaksa’s security. This now is the
second friction on the high, between the political authority and the tri
forces within just 03 months. This verbal altercation unlike that in
Jaffna, is now out in public and discussed in the media. Sinhala racism
that has lost their glitter on the Colombo roads have crowded in social
media, busy giving it a racist burst. Few protests gathered in the East
with Buddhist monks crying loud against “a Muslim insulting our Sinhala
war heroes”. Certainly an unwanted and an unnecessary prop from hard
line Sinhala “patriotism”. A dangerous trend if allowed, especially with
President Sirisena led government that is grappling to have the
Rajapaksa image copied with maximum accuracy for its ill calculated
advantage.
It is therefore necessary to see the Sampur event in context, before
pointing fingers at CM Nazeer Ahamed. On record, Governor Austin
Fernando does not deny the explanation given by CM Ahamed. CM Ahamed was
in Kinniya at another event attended by the US Ambassador Keshap and
the Governor. Was not accommodated in the chopper to go to Sampur. Was
instead asked to go on road to Sampur till the ambassador and “others”
flew to Sampur by chopper. Governor himself “managed” a seat in the
chopper that was crowded. CM’s details on the next issue in the school
at Sampur also goes without denial. It thus goes to say, the CM of the
province had not been given due recognition as the elected head of the
provincial administration, at both events. What in fact Governor
Fernando has put on record (DM on 27 May) is a long excuse to stress he
is not at fault.
His long explanation thus raises more issues than answers. The school,
Sampur M.V had been under the Navy. The LLRC recommended and stressed
civil administration should be established in the provinces and civil
life should be allowed freedom in all aspects of society. That was 04
years and 05 months ago. Yet nothing had changed. In fact the tri forces
can even secure funds to improve anything they think they should
including school facilities, and they do. The navy had thus secured
funds from a private company (Arpico?) to provide the Sampur school with
a science and a computer laboratory constructed by the navy.
Education is a wholly devolved subject, Governor Fernando is well aware
of. All schools, except those few the Colombo government grabs now and
then to call them “National” schools, come under the authority of the
PC. No funds therefore should go to any school without the approval of
the provincial education administration. But they do go, as the Sampur
school event proves and Governor Fernando also knew the navy was in
charge of the school and funds were available with the navy, when he
settled in Trincomalee as Governor. The Governor certainly has had no
issues with security forces getting involved in civil administrative
work, as he explains himself. The navy perhaps did not even want any
approval or consent from the provincial authorities to undertake the
construction work they completed.
In such context, the event owner in this instance was without doubt the
navy and obviously the local education officers and school staff has to
fall in line. The navy had not thought it important to invite the CM. To
indicate he was more thoughtful, Governor Fernando says he invited the
CM for the event as he thought it good to also have him. What does all
this mean?
Even one year and four months after the “rainbow revolution”, what the
LLRC strongly recommended has not been undertaken even by this
government in re-establishing civilian administration. Authority of
State security forces in civil administration and public life stands
firm and both North and East Governors add to it. As with the Northern
PC where Governor Cooray trespasses on the provincial council’s mandate
to develop its province, in the East Governor Fernando has also allowed
the PC to live a marginalised life. He thus sounded a sorry personality
when he told DM, “When we reached the venue, we found that the
organisers had marked the seats. Accordingly, the Navy commander of the
Eastern section sat next to Atul Keshap but the CM claimed that he
should have sat there. But I didn’t see anything wrong in the commander
sitting next to the ambassador.”
That very clearly spells out Governor Fernando’s perceived position on
civil administration and the value he gives provincial rule in relation
to the authority of Sate security forces in his province. This
perception is well cemented further in his explanation, when he goes on
to say the handing over of the school is good for the security forces as
there are allegations the army is anti-Tamil and adds, “Therefore, this
was a good opportunity for them (the security forces) to show that this
allegation was false”. He thus works on the premise there is no problem
with the security forces doing public work and is very casual about
leaving the civil administration with no clear devolved power.
That being how the Governor of the province consents to security forces
being involved in civil duties, the navy was in control of the event
from day one and they decided the importance and glamour of all
arrangements including seating. For the navy that for a long period
during the war was in charge of affairs in East along with other State
security forces, provincial councils are not as important as themselves.
In fact even the previous Governor for almost 09 years was Rear Admiral
(Rtd) Mohan Wijewickrama, one time Chief of Staff of the SL Navy.
Therefore from how the navy understands, a civilian Chief Minister is
not as important as the Eastern Province Navy Commander to sit next to
the US ambassador. The irony is, Governor Fernando, a retired senior
civil administrator also think, there is nothing wrong in that.
This conflict in who runs the province and where the CM of the province
should stand in the provincial hierarchy, had been dragging on in the
Eastern Province, even after Mr. Fernando was appointed Governor. That
conflict is yet there even in the North, even after Cooray a politician
who boasts he was always for devolution from Vijeya Kumaratunge’s time
was appointed Governor. Yet we don’t see such conflicts between
Governors and CMs in the other provinces and the question is “Why?”
In the other provinces that are fundamentally Sinhala constituencies,
almost always, the Governor is the representative of the President,
whose politics don’t contradict that of the CM and his provincial
council. The CM and the Governor in fact work in tandem with the Colombo
power centre. That is reason why the provincial leaders in the other
provinces don’t feel they need better and effective devolved power. And
the other important factor is, in these provinces the State security
forces have never been involved in running the provinces. They have not
been part of or authorities of the provincial administrations. South has
not been militarised to the intimidating extent the North and East have
been militarised.
With that the Sinhala South wrongly perceives “Devolution” as a
political process leading to separation. The South therefore don’t
discuss the fact that all outside Colombo have been neglected and denied
much needed quality “development” in this Colombo centred “Unitary
State”. Rural poverty in Sinhala South have been dragged along this
Unitary State for 67 years since independence. They don’t make an effort
to understand they too need to assert provincial rule for their own
development within better and effectively “devolved” power.
Sinhala Governors appointed to the two Tamil and Muslim dominated
provinces don’t think any differently. They don’t have to when the
Colombo government that promises “reconciliation” don’t recognise the N
& E PCs and it opts to work with TNA parliamentarians on everything
provincial. The Governors thus try to maintain a status quo, with a
dominant presence of State security forces and Colombo centric power on
which they are appointed. This leaves the two provinces denied of
political authority to run their own administrations. This status quo is
not what the Northern and Eastern people want. They expected civil
persons as Governors in their provinces to pave way for a total civil
administration. Sadly the two Sinhala Governors don’t act any different
to Major General G.A. Chandrasiri in the North and Rear Admiral (Rtd)
Mohan Wijewickrama in the East. Nor does the Colombo government that
promises “reconciliation” facilitate a change to effective civil
administration in North-East.
The recent verbal altercation is thus a reflection of this on-going
conflict. It had to surface somewhere some time. It was clearly
articulated by the Eastern PC Chief Minister in his explanation. He was
honestly clear when he gave vent to his feelings “Nobody gave me due
recognition. I have never been insulted like this before.” in the DM.
How the reaction to this continued status quo that leaves the elected
provincial council and its CM less important is not the best way it
should have been articulated. It should have been taken up the way CM
Vigneswaran protested against Governor Cooray. Still a better way would
have been to adopt a strongly worded resolution stating the protocols in
the PC. I would have therefore appreciated CM Ahamed’s explanation
more, had he included in his explanation a decent apology to the Naval
officer, who would have also felt insulted before an audience, just the
way the CM Ahamed felt humiliated before his own constituency.
