A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, July 24, 2016
How Slavery Changed the DNA of African Americans
Widespread sexual exploitation
before the Civil War strongly influenced the genetic make-up of
essentially all African Americans alive today.

Our genetic make-up is the result of history. Historical events that
influenced the patterns of migration and mating among our ancestors are
reflected in our DNA — in our genetic relationships with each other and
in our genetic risks for disease. This means that, to understand how
genes affect our biology, geneticists often find it important to tease
out how historical drivers of demographic change shaped present-day
genetics.
Understanding the connection between history and DNA is especially
important for African Americans, because slavery and discrimination
caused profound and relatively rapid demographic change. A new study now
offers a very broad look at African-American genetic history and shows
how the DNA of present-day African Americans reflects their troubled
history.
Slavery and its aftermath had a direct impact on two critical
demographic factors that are especially important in genetics: migration
and sex. The trans-Atlantic slave trade was a forced migration that
carried nearly 400,000 Africans over to the colonies and, later, the United States.
Once in North America, African slaves and their descendants mixed with
whites of European ancestry, usually because enslaved black women were
raped and exploited by white men. And, more recently, what’s known as
the Great Migration dramatically re-shaped African-American demographics
in the 20th century.Between 1915 and 1970,
six million blacks left the South and settled in the Northern,
Midwestern, and Western states, in hope of finding opportunities for a
better life.
How this turbulent history shaped the genes of African Americans has
been unclear because, until recently, most genetic studies have focused
either on populations from different geographical regions around the
world, or on Americans with European ancestry. Fortunately, African
Americans are now being included in these studies on a larger scale, and
several long-term studies have collected genetic data on thousands of
African Americans, representing all areas of the country. In a recently published study,
a team of researchers at McGill University in Montreal turned to this
data to take a broad look at the genetic history of African Americans.
African Americans with a higher fraction of European ancestry, who often have lighter skin, had better social opportunities and were thus in a better position to migrate to northern and western states.
The researchers focused on nearly 4,000 African Americans who
participated in two important studies, both sponsored by the National
Institutes of Health. The Health and Retirement Study consists of older volunteers sampled from urban and rural areas across the U.S., while the Southern Community Cohort Study
focuses on African Americans in the South, particularly areas that have
a disproportionately high burden of disease. Together, these two
studies are among the largest sources of genetic data on African
Americans. Importantly, they represent a geographically broad sampling
of the African-American population, which is critical for outlining the
patterns of genetic history.
The researchers first looked at what fraction of African Americans’
genetic ancestry could be traced back to Africa. Not surprisingly, the
data shows that, for most African Americans, the majority of their DNA
comes from African ancestors. The results also show that essentially all
African Americans have some European ancestry ancestry as well. The
genetic mix of African and European DNA, however, follows a striking
geographical trend: African Americans living in Southern states have
more African DNA (83 percent) than those living in other areas of the
country (80 percent). Conversely, African Americans outside the South
have a larger fraction of European DNA. Even within the South, this
trend holds: Blacks in Florida and South Carolina have more African DNA
than those living in Kentucky and Virginia.
One explanation for this geographical bias could be that interracial
marriages have been less frequent in Southern states. But this
explanation appears to be wrong. The McGill researchers found that most
of the European DNA among blacks today probably entered the
African-American gene pool long before the Civil War, when the vast
majority of blacks in the U.S. were slaves living in the South. The
genetic patterns observed by the researchers suggest that, for at least a
century before the Civil War, there was ongoing admixture between
blacks and whites. After slavery ended, this interracial mixing dropped
off steeply.
The implication of these findings won’t be surprising to anyone:
Widespread sexual exploitation of slaves before the Civil War strongly
influenced the genetic make-up of essentially all African Americans
alive today.
But this poses a puzzle: If African Americans can trace most of their
European ancestry to an era when America’s black population was
overwhelmingly confined to the South, why is it that African Americans
now living outside the South have more European DNA?
The researchers propose an interesting answer. They argue that the Great
Migration of African Americans out of the South was genetically biased:
African Americans with a higher fraction of European ancestry, who
often have lighter skin, had better social opportunities and were thus
in a better position to migrate to northern and Western states. Though
it will take further evidence to show this definitively, the McGill
researchers’ results imply that, even after the end of slavery,
discrimination that varied with shades of skin color continued to
influence the genetic history of African Americans.
Do these genetic findings matter to anyone other than historians and
genealogists? The answers is yes — studies of genetic history like this
one are important because they help explain why blacks and whites often
havedifferent genetic risk factors for the same diseases.
African Americans are disproportionately affected by many common
diseases, and while much of this is due to poverty and limited access to
good health care, genetics plays a role as well. If African Americans
are to fully benefit from modern health care, where diagnoses and
treatments are increasingly tailored to a patient’s DNA, it is critical
that we understand African Americans’ genetic history, and how it
contributes to their health today. In other words, we need to understand
not just the cultural and economic legacies of slavery and
discrimination, but the genetic legacy as well.