A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, July 26, 2016
Pilots Cry Foul On Unfair Business
by Nirmala Kannangara-Monday, July 25, 2016
The management of SriLankan Airlines has come under severe criticism for
their unilateral decision to stop business class lounge facilities and
other privileges given to eligible employees and their eligible
dependents on seat availability basis from July 1, 2016. However, to the
utter dismay of staff, the Chairman, the Board of Directors, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Commercial Officer have been exempted from
this restriction.
“We were told that this decision was taken as a cost-cutting measure. If
the Board of Directors is so keen to generate income, then it is they
who should set the example from the front by refusing all the facilities
given to them. By stripping us, the permanent employees, of what we
were accorded from the beginning but giving the facility to political
appointees is questionable. As employees in the permanent grade, we want
to see the airline thrive but the political appointees do not have such
a vision but are using whatever facility they are entitled to and
enjoying the perks to the maximum without caring whether their action is
detrimental to the institution or not,” reliable APGSL sources said.
Minister of Public Enterprise Development Kabir Hashim, who is the
Subject Minister of SriLankan Airlines, recently travelled in economy
class with his wife and although the airline crew had repeatedly wanted
to upgrade him to business class, Hashim had gracefully declined to
accept.
“This is a good example for the Sri Lankan management. Why cannot they
follow their minister and save millions every month by travelling in
economy class?” sources queried.
The sources on condition of anonymity accused the good governance
administration of appointing people who are not qualified in the airline
field to the board of directors.
“Not all those who have been appointed are unqualified to hold a
director post at an airline; there are one or two who, despite not
having the qualifications nevertheless have knowledge of how to lessen
the debt. But most of those in the director board only have knowledge in
incurring more losses to the company than generating profits. To our
knowledge the only chairman SriLankan Airlines ever had with a vision to
generate profits was Harry Jayawardena. He was strict to his fingertips
but he also ensured that all his staff members were well looked after.
He took to task employees who were not performing well and did not leave
any stone unturned to make this airline a profitable venture. As pilots
we have to be on board one hour before the passengers board but as a
habit we did not comply with this regulation. But during Harry
Jayawardena’s tenure no one could play out as he knew what was going on.
He did not work for the airline to get a better vehicle, regular free
tickets or any other perks; instead, his was an honorary service. If he
was there on the board now, he would have got all perks given to the
board members curtailed and given the facilities to the employees,”
sources claimed.
The sources further said how a former SriLankan employee, who later
worked for many foreign airlines where some had to be closed down due to
his ‘efficiency’ and is now back at SriLankan, is taking decisions
detrimental to the almost cash-strapped national carrier.
“When there are many eligible in-house officials who could have easily
been promoted to the post of Chief Commercial Officer (CCO), it is
alleged that on the recommendation of R. Paskaralingam, 61-year-old Siva
Ramacahndran was recruited. This in itself is against company
regulations. Other than a few senior pilots, none of the other employees
can work after the age of 60. However the present management recruited a
person above 61 years to the post of CCO who was instrumental in
closing down the Frankfurt and Paris flights a few weeks earlier. To our
knowledge the London flight incurs more losses than the Paris and
Frankfurt flights. Despite this, the present management and the CCO in
particular do not want to stop the London flight as they will miss their
regular free rides to London,” sources added.
According to the sources, it is alleged that it was the CCO that brought
up the idea to stop the business class lounge facility given to all
managerial level employees.
The sources further accused the government of appointing Captain Suren
Ratwatte as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) after the regime changed and
queried how many years of experience Capt. Ratwatte has as a CEO in any
large business organisation.
“Just because he is the brother of Charitha Ratwatte, who is a buddy of
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, he was appointed as the CEO of
SriLankan Airlines. He has no experience as a CEO in running an
establishment before. We too are pilots. Can we also get CEO posts? To
hold such a responsible post the person should have a good knowledge in
managing the organisation and not using abusive language on the pilots,”
sources claimed.
The circular dated June 30, 2016 curtailing the use of business class
lounge facilities for employees and their eligible dependents who
possess AD/ID tickets states, ‘This is to inform you that with effect
from July 1, 2016, the following policy guideline shall be implemented
in connection with providing lounge facility for passengers holding
AD/ID tickets at system-wide airports. All passengers holding AD/ID
tickets will not be entitled to lounge facility at the Colombo and
overseas airports. The affected categories are – all SriLankan airline
staff and their dependents (active staff and ex-UL staff) travelling on
duty or vacation excluding Chairman/ Board of Directors and their
eligible dependents travelling on duty or vacation will be entitled to
lounge facilities at Colombo and overseas airports, Chief Officers
travelling on official duty will be entitled to lounge facilities at
Colombo airport only and all other staff members entitled to business
class firm tickets travelling on official duty will be entitled to
lounge facilities only at the Colombo airport.’
Accusing the management, the sources said that the policy decision was
taken without consulting the employees and accused the Board of
Directors of not keeping the APGSL members informed until their members
were barred from entering the business class lounge. The sources further
accused the management of curtailing the privileges given to its
employees due to lack of funds.
“We understand the restrictions we have to face due to the airline’s
financial situation. If it is so what made the SriLankan management book
a hospitality box at Lord’s cricket grounds in London during Sri
Lanka-England final test match and spend a few millions on food and
drinks? In addition the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the
CCO too travelled to London for this occasion. What made them spend
money on unnecessary events when the airline is suffering? There are so
many other events this airline has sponsored without taking into
consideration that we are running at a loss,” sources added.
According to the sources, although the policy decision taken states that
the Chairman and the Board of Directors and their eligible dependents
can use the lounge facility and Chief Officers and other staff who are
entitled to business class firm tickets are entitled to use the lounge
facility only at the Colombo airport and their eligible dependents are
not entitled, any exceptions to the policy stipulated above could be
authorised only by the CEO or the CCO, questions have been raised as to
how certain it is that these two officials would not authorise their
kith and kin to use the lounge facility not only at Colombo but also
overseas airports as well.
“We know what they are up to. They drafted the policy decision just to
show us that only the Chairman and the Board of Directors together with
their families can enjoy the lounge facility but not even the CEO and
CCO. But in reality they all are in one boat and enjoy all the perks,”
sources said.
Although the sources said that APGSL wrote to Chairman Ajith Dias
seeking his clarification as to why a new policy was introduced on the
use of the business class lounge only for the staff but not for the
management, for the past three weeks neither the Chairman nor the CEO or
CCO have replied clarifying their stance.
Speaking further, the sources explained how the airline will suffer more
strife due to the cancellation of one A350 aircraft and added that if
the government wants to cancel the order for the other seven aircraft as
well, it would be a huge loss to the already suffering airline.
“Although the Prime Minister said that the government has to pay US $ 12
million to cancel one aircraft and it had been done, we understand that
to cancel one aircraft order we have to pay nearly US$ 16 million.
Unless they are bought and could be leased out to break even, the
country in general and the airline in particular are going to suffer
immensely,” sources added.
Chief Executive Officer, SriLankan Airlines Captain Suren Ratwatte was
uncontactable for a comment. Although a text message was forwarded
seeking a comment from him on the allegations levelled against the
management, Ratwatte had not responded at the time of going to press.
