A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, August 29, 2016
Afghanistan Inviting More Troubles
( August 26, 2016, Islamabad, Sri Lanka Guardian) After
Narendra Modi’s speech on August 15 this year, the severe reaction of
brave people of Balochistan was neither unexpected nor strange. They
were already in a state of rage and fury against the activities of
R&AW in Balochistan and they no doubt hold Modi responsible for all
such activities; Modi’s speech simply added fuel to fire. Unfortunately
some Indian supported elements, very much active in Afghanistan, tried
to exploit the situation in their favour. In response to public response
in Balochistan against Modi’s speech a group of Afghan demonstrator not
only burnt Pakistan’s flag but also attacked the friendship gate at
Chaman. After this incident the border security forces of Pakistan
closed the Pak-Afghan border to avert any untoward incident. The
situation resulted in suspending the movement of trade shipments between
two countries along with supplies for NATO forces in Afghanistan.
According to different media reports there are long queues of vehicles
on both sides of the border; with people on both sides facing problems
as a result of the border closure but more in trouble are the people of
Afghanistan. This situation could have been avoided if the Honourable
president of Afghanistan Mr. Ashraf Ghani had played his role positively
and sensibly.
Before his selection as President of Afghanistan, Mr. Ashraf Ghani was
being considered and ranked as a wise man among the people of Pakistan
but he did not come up to their expectations since after joining the
office of the President of Afghanistan. On 25th of April
2016, talking to his nation at joint session of the Afghan parliament,
apparently he outlined his vision for the future of the nation’s
security but actually he invited more troubles for the already
distressed Afghan nation. In his speech he drew a very clear line of
demarcation between the friends and foes of Afghanistan. He said, ‘The
enemies of Afghanistan are those who work for foreigners including
Daesh, al-Qaeda, the human killers of Haqqani network and some Afghan
Taliban who take pleasure in killing their countrymen and continue the
war and terrorism. There is no place for conducting talks with groups
like these.’ He added, ‘I categorically announce that we do not want
Pakistan to bring Taliban to the talks but we urge Pakistan to comply
with the QCG agreement and take action against those whose presence has
been confirmed by our intelligence services and intelligence services of
our international partners. If Pakistan feels reluctant to take
military action against these criminal, then it should hand them over to
our Sharia courts to punish them. Dividing the terrorists into good and
bad ones could have negative repercussions.’ Throughout his speech Mr.
Ghani kept on blaming Pakistan and Taliban directly or indirectly for
the destabilization of Afghanistan. Commenting upon the QCG agreement,
he referred to Pakistan, ‘Those who failed to deliver on their promises
within the framework of these efforts are now pushed in further
isolation on an international level.’
How pathetic is Ashraf Ghani’s approach towards a country which has
been facing a lot of troubles because of Afghanistan’s internal state of
civil war. If the politicians of Afghanistan, the ‘bold’ soldiers of
Afghanistan and the ‘real friends’ of Afghanistan were so sincere and
devoted to the peace and prosperity of Afghanistan, the situation could
have never been so painfully agonizing for the people of Afghanistan.
The actual problem is that most of the rulers of Afghanistan have never
been ‘indigenously’ and ‘genuinely’ from Afghanistan; unfortunately they
have ever been ‘imported’ ones. Be it Hamid Karzai or Ashraf Ghani;
most of the democratically elected presidents had their strings in the
hands of their foreign masters. If they had really belonged to
Afghanistan, they would have never blamed Pakistan for the internal
warlike situation. They won’t have forgotten that Pakistan is a country
taking care of more than 1.7 million Afghan refugees for the last thirty
years. It is simply the climax and extreme of Ashraf Ghani’s hatred
against Pakistan that he didn’t even like to include Pakistan’s name in
the list of Afghanistan’s well-wishers. During his historical address to
the joint session of the Afghan parliament he said talking about the
terrorist attack in Kabul in April, “As you all know, the world
including the Muslim nations, particularly Saudi and Islamic republic of
Iran, the United Nations, the majority of Asian countries, Europe, US,
China, Japan, Australia and Canada denounced the act by the terrorists.
But the attack in Kabul further isolated the terrorists and their
foreign backers in the world arena.”
In short he mentioned the name of every Tom Dick and Harry but there was
no appreciation or acknowledgement for Pakistan. It seems that this
speech was written by someone from the RA&W who simply had just one
target; Blaming and Defaming Pakistan. What Pakistan must do in such a
hostile atmosphere; the question arises. Does Pakistan really cannot
survive without having relations with Afghanistan? Why are we always
eager to arrange and facilitate negotiations and table-talks between
Afghan government and the Taliban? Why are we bearing such a huge burden
of Afghan refugees when we have a lot of our own problems? Furthermore
in guise of the Afghan refugees so many agents of the RA&W and NDS
are simply causing a very serious loss to our society by promoting
terrorist activities. Better we let our Afghan brothers live their own
life and let them deal with the Taliban themselves.