A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Saturday, September 3, 2016
The Gandhiyam
1979 – 83: The Mounting Repression – Part V
The feeling among Tamils that they needed a separate state reached a peak during the years following the 1977 violence.
Securing the border areas of the North and East from state sponsored
colonisation had been a burning Tamil concern from the 1950s. The
nationalisation of British owned estates in the early 1970s by the
SLFP-led government led to disruption. This in turn resulted in
starvation. There was also eviction of estate families by organised mob
attacks. Many of the victims, Tamils of recent Indian origin, drifted to
the North-East in search of a new livelihood. The drift became a flood
following the 1977 communal violence.
From the time these displacements began, several politically backed
Tamil groups sprang up to help these people to settle in the North-East,
often along border areas and to provide them with means to a
livelihood. There was a race as it were between these Tamil groups on
the one hand and state-backed Sinhalese groups on the other, to match
Tamil settlement with Sinhalese settlement. Settlements of displaced
Hill Country Tamils came up in the interior of Batticaloa District in
1975 when Bradman Weerakoon was GA, Batticaloa, and Nihal Jayawickrema
was Secretary, Ministry of Justice, in the SLFP-led government. The
Police were sent in. Settlers were beaten and jailed. Telegrams were
sent to Indira Gandhi, Prime Minister of India, on their behalf.
Thondaman and Devanayagam (both later ministers in the 1977 government)
too were helping the settlers. Shanmuganathan who was then District
Judge, Batticaloa, ruled the police action unlawful. The settlers
dispersed by police action came back and prospered in areas such as
Punanai and other interior areas until the violence of the 80s, when
they had to flee once more.
Dr. Rajasundaram who was a medical practitioner, was involved in settlement work from early in the 70s. Following the violence of 1977 he and his wife, Dr. Shanthy nee’ Karalasingham who graduated from University of Ceylon, Peradeniya, in 1967, returned from England and started the Gandhiyam in Vavuniya. The object of Gandhiyam was to rehabilitate victims of the 1977 violence in the North-East. Its resettlement activities ranged through Trincomalee, Amparai, and Batticaloa districts as well. From the beginning, these activities had the support of all levels of Tamil society ranging through the universities, government services and professional classes.
Dr. Rajasundaram who was a medical practitioner, was involved in settlement work from early in the 70s. Following the violence of 1977 he and his wife, Dr. Shanthy nee’ Karalasingham who graduated from University of Ceylon, Peradeniya, in 1967, returned from England and started the Gandhiyam in Vavuniya. The object of Gandhiyam was to rehabilitate victims of the 1977 violence in the North-East. Its resettlement activities ranged through Trincomalee, Amparai, and Batticaloa districts as well. From the beginning, these activities had the support of all levels of Tamil society ranging through the universities, government services and professional classes.
Posterity may find the passions of the times centred around land and
borders truly remarkable. Without them, Tamil separatism and militancy
would have lacked their cutting edge. It seemed a game of wits of the
Tamil intelligentsia pitted against the wits of the Sinhalese
intelligentsia. On the one side it was a passion for the preservation of
what goes with a sense of community, and the desire for a homeland,
secure from violence. On the other it was a passion to preserve what was
deemed a Sinhalese unitary state from ancient times and to prevent what
was perceived as the traditional Tamil menace from acquiring space for
further expansion. This ideological position, as we shall see, was not
unmixed with pedestrian economic and political motives for the ruling
class.
What the Tamil side lacked in state power, man power and gun power, it
tried to compensate with an articulate world-wide diaspora with no love
for the Sri Lankan State, who could now and then pull off a propaganda
coup highly irritating to the latter. The full potential of the Tamil
diaspora did not come to be felt until after July ’83, and too often
then, not to the best advantage of Tamils here.
The majority of those in and around groups like the Gandhiyam harboured
separatist sentiments. Sometimes rural TULF supporters who worked with
the Gandhiyam found Dr. Rajasundaram’s criticism of Amirthalingam too
strong to stomach.
Depending on how one looked at it, Gandhiyam could have been viewed as
causing a problem. But that problem also had an easy solution. For one
the Government would have had to demonstrate in the clearest terms that
it had no ethnic agenda, and no intention of pursuing demographic
changes through colonisation of the border areas so as to bring
insecurity to the minorities. The other was to address the many genuine
grievances of Tamils in the Hill Country. This meant a political
settlement in the broader sense. The Government showed few signs of
decisive movement in this direction. That led to problems of a more
serious nature.

