A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Saturday, December 31, 2016
British
Prime Minister Theresa May speaks at the annual Conservative Party
Conference in Birmingham, Britain, Oct. 2, 2016. /File Photo (Toby
Melville/Reuters)
By Michael Birnbaum December 30 at 10:36 AM
BRUSSELS — British Prime Minister Theresa May condemned a blunt speechthis
week by Secretary of State John F. Kerry on the state of the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, an unusual move that boosted Britain’s
relations with the incoming Trump administration at the expense of
President Obama.
The rare diplomatic spat between Britain and the United States, which
was met with surprise by the State Department, highlighted the
fast-collapsing influence of the lame-duck White House. It also pointed
to a vast reordering of international affairs expected after Trump takes
office in three weeks, as U.S. allies position themselves to curry
favor in the new order.
The transatlantic split was particularly unexpected given that May’s
government acted as a key broker between U.S. and Palestinian interests
ahead of a U.N. Security Council vote last week to declare Israeli
settlement construction “illegal.” British diplomats worked as
go-betweens in shaping the measure to ensure that the language was
acceptable to the United States, Britain’s Guardian and Israel’s Haaretz
newspapers reported this week.
Kerry on Wednesday offered a harsh assessment of the government of
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying that “his current
coalition is the most right-wing in Israeli history, with an agenda
driven by its most extreme elements.” He criticized persistent Israel
settlement expansion on the West Bank as a threat to the “two-state
solution” under which Israel and a new Palestinian state would coexist
side by side.
In major speech, outgoing U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defends the U.S. abstention of a U.N. resolution vote that demanded Israel end settlement building, saying the vote reflected U.S. values and was intended to defend the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. (Reuters)
In major speech, outgoing U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defends the U.S. abstention of a U.N. resolution vote that demanded Israel end settlement building, saying the vote reflected U.S. values and was intended to defend the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. (Reuters)
May’s office retorted that “we do not believe that it is appropriate to
attack the composition of the democratically elected government of an
ally.” It said in an emailed statement late Thursday that “we are also
clear that the settlements are far from the only problem in this
conflict. In particular, the people of Israel deserve to live free from
the threat of terrorism, with which they have had to cope for too long.”
The move was an olive branch both to Netanyahu and to President-elect
Donald Trump, who railed against the Obama administration’s decision to
abstain from a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning
the settlements and who has urged Israel to “stay strong” until he
assumes office Jan. 20. Trump has expressed near-unconditional support
for actions by the Israeli government, breaking with long-standing U.S.
policy that has sought a middle ground between the two sides.
Kerry’s speech and the U.S. abstention in the Security Council vote were
received warmly by Germany and France, among other European nations,
which led to a stunned reaction in Washington to the message from May’s
office.
“We are surprised by the U.K. Prime Minister's office statement given
that Secretary Kerry's remarks — which covered the full range of threats
to a two-state solution, including terrorism, violence, incitement and
settlements — were in line with the U.K.'s own longstanding policy and
its vote at the United Nations last week,” the State Department said in a
statement.
British leaders have publicly embraced Trump since his victory last
month, despite his urging that Nigel Farage, a lead campaigner for
Britain’s exit from the European Union and a thorn in the side of the
British government, be named British ambassador to Washington. Britain,
which is preparing to negotiate the terms of a messy exit from the E.U.,
is hoping that a strong economic relationship with the United States
will help smooth out the disruptions from leaving the union’s common
market.
During his presidential campaign, Trump praised Britain’s vote to leave
the European Union and took to calling himself “Mr. Brexit.”
For the first time in 36 years, the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution critical of Israel's Jewish settlements on Palestinian territory. The United States abstained. (Reuters)
For the first time in 36 years, the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution critical of Israel's Jewish settlements on Palestinian territory. The United States abstained. (Reuters)
This week, Britain’s ambassador in Washington, Kim Darroch, expressed hopethat
Trump and May would build “on the legacy of previous leaders such as
President Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.”
Kerry’s hour-long speech Wednesday was unusual in its breadth and
frankness, coming from a man who devoted much of his energy as the top
U.S. diplomat toward Israeli-Palestinian negotiations that were
ultimately abandoned.
Kerry said Wednesday that Israeli settlement activity, which has
accelerated in recent years, was extending far into the West Bank, “in
the middle of what, by any reasonable definition, would be the future
Palestinian state.”
“No one thinking seriously about peace can ignore the reality of what the settlements pose to that peace,” he said.
The speech came at a historic low in relations between Israel and the
United States, the Jewish state’s staunchest international ally. The
Obama administration intended the abstention on the U.N. resolution as a
warning sign to the Netanyahu government that international support
would not be unconditional, as settlement populations swell on territory
extending beyond the pre-1967 armistice lines that defined Israel’s
boundaries.
The Australian government also distanced itself Friday from the Obama
administration’s stance on settlements and the U.N. resolution.
Australia supports negotiations leading to two independent states, Foreign Minister Julie Bishop told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.
But she said that Australia — which is not a member of the Security
Council where the vote was taken — did not support the U.N. resolution
condemning settlements.
“In voting at the U.N., the coalition government has consistently not
supported one-sided resolutions targeting Israel,” the statement said.
The impending realignment of U.S. foreign policy that apparently led to
the rare break between Downing Street and the White House could also be
seen Friday in Russia, where President Vladimir Putin opted not to retaliate publiclyagainst fresh U.S. sanctions and the expulsion of 35 Russian diplomats from U.S. territory.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov had recommended Friday the
expulsion of 35 U.S. diplomats in retaliation. But Putin appears to be
banking on markedly warmer relations with Trump. The president-elect has
praised the Kremlin and expressed disbelief at an assessment by the
U.S. intelligence community that Russian-government-backed hackers were
responsible for the leaks of sensitive emails from Democratic Party
officials in a bid to help Trump win the White House.
Carol Morello in Washington contributed to this report.