A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)![](https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/_wDzb26_rsiU/SccVZH0VZ1I/AAAAAAAAAFU/zlOM6bDTxjo/s200/Slide6.JPG)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, April 30, 2017
A Case for curbing the Israeli Embassy
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzU751L8uaeqBIlHFHjiFQRdzL4dhqfoslJdWhUvzwRHnMd5RNWvVcOMVMqBVsgF0VvolYUDIHSt5G-cAF9Xez3r8xwGWc5p8kvjTf3cNsIA7AxzwVzWNfdxviBYABYMvunhpb8ZYJ9CA/s1600/tumblr_inline_onboyzwxXt1qb1icv_250.png)
( April 29, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) This writer’s last article Israel and Sri Lankan Islamophobia provoked a great many replies in the Colombo Telegraph including
of course from Backlash, one of the two chief propagandists against
this writer. He came out on April 23 with a spectacular revelation that
merits dissemination on a national scale. He wrote “Israel’s
contribution to the good of mankind, then and now, is unmatched in the
annals of man’s history”. That of course is mind-boggling for its
hyperbole. But the dog-like devotion to Israel that it displays is the
sort of thing one has to expect from a fierce Islamophobic racist such
as Backlash. It does not therefore merit status as national news. What
does is the following: “That the Israelis backed the BBS is the worst
kept secret in the country”.
That has to be regarded as a spectacular revelation. Every Muslim with
whom this writer has checked – all of them very well-informed persons –
reacted uniformly by stating that Israeli backing for the BBS has been
widely suspected among Muslims but nothing has been established. None of
us has seen anything to that effect in print. It is therefore not one
of the worst kept secrets in the country but one of the best. Why is
Backlash making the revelation now? According to a contact who has made a
professional study of propaganda Backlash is resorting to a well-known
ploy: when a propagandist loses credibility he does something to restore
it so that his further lies will be believed. Backlash was losing
credibility with suspicions being roused that he is an Israeli agent –
so he distances himself from Israel by making the seriously
incriminating revelation about Israel’s backing for the BBS.
However he has made it clear that he remains staunchly pro-Israel. His
bizarre hyperbole about Israel’s unmatched contribution to the good of
mankind, then and now – meaning today’s expansionist apartheid Israel
that outrages most of the rest of the world – declares unequivocally his
continuing dog-like devotion to Israel. That devotion is apparent also
in his virtual justification of Israel’s backing for the BBS. His
panegyric is worth quoting in full: “This may be because misguided
Muslims unnecessarily annoyed the Israelis by their weekly demos
opposite the US Embassy in Colombo. This went on for years – until the
Israelis obviously retaliated. The Tamasha demos after Friday Jumma
prayers at Kollupitiya stopped immediately. Another debacle like the
ill-considered Halal misadventure”. This writer cannot vouch for the
accuracy or otherwise of what Backlash is claiming. What can be said
with certainty is that he has been so accustomed for so long to being
economical with the truth that the divide between fact and fiction no
longer exists for him. A glaring instance is his assumption that three
editors continue to publish this writer’s weekly articles – which are no
better than excrement – knowing that they make most readers “grin and
bear”. He expects others to believe that!
The contradiction between Backlash’s devotion to Israel and his exposure
of Israel’s criminal backing for the BBS is beyond this writer’s
comprehension. What is important is to examine the implications of his
spectacular revelation. We know that the BBS was funded with extravagant
munificence supposedly by Norwegian Islamophobic groups. We know that
the BBS was in association with the Wirathu gang in Myanmar, both of
which had the same force behind them. We know that Wirathu has been
forced into silence by the Buddhist authorities in Myanmar while the BBS
leader was received the other day by President Sirisena along with
nationally respected Prelates. We have good reason to suspect that the
last Government knew the Israelis were backing the BBS but chose to keep
quiet about it.
We can have many convictions and suspicions of the order outlined in the
preceding paragraph but what evidence is there to show that the
Israelis really backed the BBS? Backlash, a propagandist devoid of moral
scruples, may be lying. He may be lying for some unfathomable reason
because he is an unbalanced person. After all, who but an unbalanced
person will expect anyone to believe that three editors publish this
writer’s weekly articles in the knowledge that they make most readers
“grin and bear”? That surely bespeaks a pukkah lunatic. However, there
are sound commonsensical reasons to incriminate the Israelis. We know
that former President Rajapakse believed that the BBS hate campaign was
part of the machinery set up by the West to topple him. Norwegian
fundamentalist groups could not have been interested in effecting
Governmental change here. One or more Governments had to be involved in
that, and the most plausible candidate for the major role is surely
Israel. By backing the BBS it could help the West in toppling the last
Government and at the same time spread Islamophobic hatred. That would
be consistent with the argument in the last article of this writer: an
apartheid system in Israel would have the best prospect of enduring if
there is an apartheid world order in which the Muslims in particular are
held in special loathing as a lesser breed.
What should be done? It is relevant to recount a development that took
place when this writer was Ambassador in Manila in the first half of the
‘eighties. He was asked by our Foreign Ministry to report on how the
Philippine Government treated the Israeli Embassy. Foreign Secretary
Pacifico Castro said that this writer’s impression was quite correct
that the activities of the Israeli Embassy had been severely
circumscribed. Castro had crafted the policy, got his Government’s
approval, and summoned the Israeli Ambassador to tell him that the
Philippines was facing a serious separatist rebellion in Muslim Mindanao
and therefore the Israeli Embassy had to be virtually non-functional.
The Israeli Ambassador, a very nice man, abided by that rule
scrupulously.
Backlash’s spectacular revelation has to be officially investigated. He
may be unbalanced in some ways but not in every way, and therefore he
has to be taken seriously. Besides, the writer has given a very cogent
reason above why we can be practically certain that Israel backed the
BBS. The findings may show that the national interest requires that the
activities of the Israeli Embassy be severely curbed. The writer will
assert two principles. One is that a Government that acquiesces in a
foreign-backed hate campaign against one of its minorities deserves to
fall. The last Government fell. The other is that a nation that
acquiesces in a foreign-backed hate campaign against one of its
minorities is not fit for Independence. It will lose it.
There cannot be the slightest doubt that there has been a concerted
smear campaign against this writer over a very long period. Common sense
dictates certain conclusions. No one reads all the articles that become
available to him, particularly today when there is so much excellent
reading material to suit every taste through the internet. The reader
will therefore eschew in particular articles they regard as no better
than excrement by writers whose guts they hate – which is how Backlash
and Kettikaran view this writer and his articles. But they obsessively
read him week after week and month after month. In exchanges in the
Colombo Telegraph they have been repeatedly asked to explain this
paradox, but unsurprisingly they have failed to do so. Both specialise
in the bucket attack in which fact and reason don’t matter, and only the
dirt thrown at the writer does – as shown in the last article.
Kettikaran clearly showed his extreme Islamophobia when he imaged Muslim
children as “piglets”, and he has made it clear that he sees nothing
wrong in that. Backlash concealed his Islamophobia but he now declares
his dog-like devotion to apartheid Israel which goes together with
Islamophobia.
Both have clearly been engaged in an Islamophobic hate campaign. In
whose interest? All the indications are that they are servitors of
Israel, may be without knowing it. The important point is that Israel is
the only country in the world that could have an interest, a vital
interest, in promoting Islamophobia on a world-wide scale. The
Government should make investigations, particularly into the revelation
about Israeli backing for the BBS, and take appropriate action, if
necessary severely curbing the activities of the Israeli Embassy, as
happened in Manila.