A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Sri Lanka: My Experiences as a Judge
There is no legal basis at all to delay the Fundamental Rights application simply because a criminal action is pending. In law, the two are very separate types of actions and the matters that the courts have to decide are based on different legal criteria.
( May 31, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian ) I
am writing this to the public as a judge who has presided over the
affairs of the public for 16 years as a Magistrate and as a District
Court Judge. For all those 16 years, my record has been impeccable.
I want to bring to the notice of the public that, due to a certain
judgment I gave as a District Court Judge in a civil dispute, which I
did to the best of my ability and purely on the basis of the principles
of law and justice – all of which I was appointed to uphold -, I have
come to a very serious difficulty.
The judgment in this case, which I gave in favour of the defendant,
seems to have offended one of the witnesses, who happens to be a Senior
Legal Counsel and, to my knowledge, a relative of the former Chief
Justice Mohan Peiris. The day I delivered the judgment, it was reported
to me by court staff that this gentleman had openly said that he will
see to it ‘that I will lose my position as a Judge’.
A month or so later, I was called upon by the Chief Justice and he
demanded that I resign from my position. I told him that no charge had
been made against me and that there had been no inquiry, and that
therefore the proper procedure would be to conduct such an inquiry into
any claims before making an appropriate decision. In response, I was
talked down to in humiliating language and threatened with losing my
position.
Several months later, I was called upon by the Bribery Commission and
was asked to submit details of all my income and assets. I did that
immediately, by way of affidavits, and also provided the necessary
references. To this date, the Bribery Commission has not informed me
that any of the information I have so provided is incorrect or
inadequate.
I understand that this inquiry was begun on the basis of an anonymous
complaint. I do not know the name or any other details of the
complainant, and therefore, I am unable to say what may have motivated
such a person and what my relationship to that person could be.
With the beginning of the inquiry, the incremental salary increases
given to me in my position as a judge were stopped. I wrote to the
Judicial Services Commission giving them all the details, and also wrote
to the Bribery Commission and asked them for an inquiry and an
immediate exoneration. This was important to me for many reasons. My
position, which could have been elevated to the High Court, was affected
by this inquiry and, therefore, I had to retire without the usual
promotions that were due to me as to any other Judge in the service.
I constantly requested the Bribery Commission and the Judicial Services
Commission to bring this matter to an end, either by way of declaring me
exonerated, which I know and believe is my due, or otherwise to indict
me so that I will be able to prove my innocence in a court of law.
After five years of pleading without any positive result, I filed a
Fundamental Rights Application before the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka,
and asked for an inquiry on the basis of Article 126 of the Sri Lankan
Constitution. This, after all, is the final resort that any citizen, be
he a judge or any other person, has.
I was fully aware of the risks involved in filing a fundamental rights
case. I knew that it could have dangerous results. I am aware of many
people who have been exposed to serious threats and violence by the
respondents in some of these cases. In one case, while a fundamental
rights petition filed by a young man was being heard, he, his father and
his mother were all made to disappear.
My case was called by the Supreme Court on a few occasions. The
Respondents purposefully sought dates to obtain advice from the Attorney
General.
No objections to my Petition have been filed and none of the facts that I
have relied upon have been contradicted by my opponents.
Several months later, I heard that an indictment had been filed against
me, although it has not yet been served on me. I don’t know what the
charges could be. All that I know is that some charges are reported to
have been filed.
My position is that this has been done for one purpose: as a counter
action against the Fundamental Rights application that I have filed in
the Supreme Court
I believe that the Respondents want to use this indictment in order
either to get me to withdraw the Fundamental Rights application that I
have made or to delay the hearing of the Fundamental Rights application
on the basis that there is a criminal action against me and that the
criminal action should be heard first before the Fundamental Rights
application.
There is no legal basis at all to delay the Fundamental Rights
application simply because a criminal action is pending. In law, the two
are very separate types of actions and the matters that the courts have
to decide are based on different legal criteria.
One issue is about whether a fundamental rights violation has taken
place and the other is about whether a crime has been committed.
I am aware of several judgements that were delivered while criminal
actions were pending. If need be, I could give the details of such
judgments. However, I am aware that, particularly at the time when Chief
Justice Sarath Silva was presiding, there were many cases that were
postponed until a criminal trial was held and a few such cases have been
pending in the Supreme Court for over ten years because criminal
actions, once started, are subjected to the normal delays that are a
part of our legal system, and that includes the delays in the appeals
and the re-trials. Again, I am able to give details of such cases if it
is required.
Therefore, my plea to all, to the judiciary as well as to the public, is
to ensure that I will have the benefit of a speedy trial and a speedy
hearing of the Fundamental Rights application.
The Fundamental Rights application should be heard irrespective of any
issues that may arise in the criminal case, and the criminal case itself
should be heard as speedily as possible.
I am aware that the greatest trap that an innocent man could be placed
in is to have a fabricated criminal charge filed against him. It makes
him a victim of a lengthy trial for may many years to come. It could be
ten years or even more, judging by many cases, which I am able to cite.
Therefore, I am bringing to the notice of the public that I, having
myself been a judge, have been exposed to one of the gravest problems
that any citizen could be exposed to.
I am also letting the public know that when the criminal case is before
the courts I will demand a trial by a jury, which is one way of ensuring
a day-to-day trial, and that will speed up the trial process.
As a citizen and a judge with a long record of service, I must tell you that there are some things that I am unable to fight:
A. I am unable to fight prolonged delays in a criminal trial
This is a way to destroy a man, his family and everything he stands for, and to irreparably stain his reputation.
I will be helpless in this situation and the denial of justice in this
manner is something that, even as a former judge, I know I am simply
unable to fight.
B.
I also want to inform the public that, from what the law says about
equality of arms, I am not in a position to match the powerful people
who are trying to victimise me.
Therefore, my plea to the judiciary, the judges who were my fellow
colleagues in these long years, to the legal profession and the Bar
association, and to the public in general, is this: please do not ignore
this as one individual’s problem; this is a problem that affects the
very nature of the justice system we have and the way injustice is
perpetrated through our system.
I would therefore urge all of you to ensure that the criminal trial that
has been initiated against me be held as speedily as possible in the
coming few months and that the Fundamental Rights application that I
have filed should be heard without any kind of obstruction based on the
criminal trial or otherwise.
While I am making this plea for myself, I am also aware that the outcome could be of great use to the public in general.
It is time that we fight against the abuse of the justice system to perpetrate injustice.
The writer is
a former District Court Judge and Magistrate. This article based on an
open letter by the writer originally published by the Asian Human Rights
Commission in Hong Kong.