A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Constitution-Making Process & The Pressure From The Buddhist Clergy
The Venerable Mahanayake Theros of the Buddhist Chapters suddenly met in Kandy on 4.7.2017 under the leadership of the Mahanayake Thero of the Asgiriya Chapter,
Most Venerable Warakagoda Gnanaratna Thero. The purpose is to stall the
ongoing Constitution-making process which is already more or less half
way through. First of all, the million dollar question is as to why such
a concern on their part arose after nearly one and a half years, and
not at the beginning of the process.
As is well known, the National Unity Government, with the two
traditional arch rivals, happily joining hands for the first time in the
country’s long term interest, secured the people’s mandate to form the
National Unity Government, inter alia, to enact and operate a new
Constitution. Hence, it is irrevocably incumbent on the Government to
carry out the sovereign people’s mandate, and there shouldn’t be any let
or hindrance from any quarter in this respect. Of course, all sections
of the people of all races and religions have had the opportunity to
present their views and ideas from the time the Public Representations
Committee headed by a political leader and Attorney-at-law, Lal Wijenayake started
functioning at the inception. What has to be borne in mind by one and
all is that the people’s mandate cannot be jettisoned.
Now, it is common knowledge that the former President, Mahinda Rajapaksa who had pledged in 2005 to abolish the Executive Presidency,
reneged on that pledge. On the contrary, having gone half way through
his second term, he got the infamous 18th amendment passed in Parliament
to remove the mandatory 2-term limit to seek election to the
Presidency, insatiably aspiring to become the first 3rd term President,
but of course it misfired, thanks to the will of he people which is the
most paramount factor. Presently, of course, he is a Member of
Parliament as well as the foremost leader of the Joint Opposition (JO)
representing the dissident wing of the UPFA, including the Mahajana
Eksath Peramuna (MEP), the National Freedom Front (NFF) and the
Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) led by Parliamentarians Dinesh Gunawardena,
Wimal Weerawansa and Udaya Gammanpila respectively. The notorious
propaganda of the JO is that (a) Federalism has all but been conceded,
putting paid to the Unitary State system, and (b) that the foremost
place given to Buddhism is being compromised. Such a bizarre, misleading
propaganda is nothing but an insult to their own intelligence, besides
taking the sovereign people for fools.
Well, the National Unity Government appeared somewhat taken aback by the
sudden moves of the Buddhist Chapters which might well erode the
Government’s 2015 mandate to take the country along the path of peace
and reconciliation, to fast-track economic development for democracy to
thrive, so that people of all races and religions could live in peace
and amity.
Meantime, President Maithripala Sirisena has met with the Mahanayake
Theros in Kandy and assured them that that there will be due
consultations with them once the final draft Constitution is ready. Of
course, the Mahanayake Theros can have their say even at this stage of
the Constitution-making processes, but at the end of the day, the
National Unity Government should boldly act in accordance with the
people’s mandate handed down at the two elections in 2015. What is of
most paramount importance is that there should be no question of
pandering to the whims and fancies of any segment, apparently driven by a
hidden hand. It is quite appropriate in this connection quote a
journalist of yore of no mean repute, Tarzie Vitachchi, from his book
titled “Emergency ‘58”. Here is what he said on the question of the price paid for pandering:
“When a Government, however popular, begins to pander to racial or
religious emotionalism, merely because it is the loudest of the raucous
demands made on it, and then meddles in the administration and
enforcement of law and order for the benefits of its favorites, or win
the plaudits of a crowd, however hysterical it may be, catastrophe is
certain”