A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, July 31, 2017
Reforming Islam & The New World Order
Ever since the current wave Militant Islamism led by Al-Qaeda burst
out of Saudi Arabia, the birth place of Wahhabism, captured an
international foothold and destabilised many a household and nation the
call to reform Islam has become louder and louder. Although one can
understand the emotional anxiety of the callers in the context of the
horrific acts of violence and terror unleashed by Muslim extremists their
emotions only demonstrate on the one hand the enormity of ignorance
that prevails amongst the callers about this living faith, which is by
any count is the way of life of nearly one-fifth of humanity, and on the
other their refusal to see the crucial link between Islamist militancy
and the so called New World Order with its neo-liberal economic
paradigm.
To
start with, the reform seekers seem to assume that there is a
monolithic entity called Islam that needs to be refined and reformed by
someone like the Pope or by a governing body like the Vatican in
Catholic Christianity. On the contrary, there is neither a universally
recognized grand mufti nor an internationally empowered Muslim religious
institution that can initiate and implement binding reforms in the
world of Islam which now stretches from the Canada in the west to China
in the east and from Scandinavia in the north to New Zealand in the
south. This demographically vast and geographically dispersed faith
community although united theoretically in the fundamental beliefs of
Islam yet differs significantly in the translation of those beliefs in
practice.
In
reality, living Islam is a smorgasbord of beliefs and practices,
customs and traditions, and, rulings and debates that are so
multifarious and sometime even contradictory that it is almost
impossible to condense them into a single entity. The name Islam itself
was a convenient moniker invented by the Orientalists in the 18th and 19th centuries
who essentialised the theological, juridical, philosophical and
cultural heterogeneity that pervaded the Muslim world since the 7th century
in order for that invented entity to be compared and contrasted with
Christianity and Christian civilization of the inventors with a
deliberate intention of denigrating the faith of the Muslims.
Within the spiritual amalgam of Muslims are the Islams of
the mystics or Sufis, of the theologians of different schools within
the Sunni and Shia sects, of the philosophers and rationalists, and
above all of the syncretic faith of the Muslim masses, just to name a
few. All
these islams derive their existential rationale from the way each of
them interpret the original sources of the faith mainly the Quran and
the actions and sayings of the Prophet, the Hadith. Even
within a particular variety of Islam some believers view these sources
as contextually constrained and therefore their contents are subject to
debates and discursiveness, while others believe that they are
context-free and time-free and therefore should be accepted on face
value. The militant Islamists belong to the latter category and herein
lies the crux of the problem regarding reformation in Islam. Which Islam
does one want to reform?
In
a free and competitive market for goods and services the ones that are
of superior quality would naturally fetch a high price and would be
demanded intensely while the inferior ones would lose demand and
disappear from the market eventually. Some goods and services may come
and go with season and fashion. This economic truism is also applicable
to the market for ideas and ideologies.
Militant
Islamism driven by its narrow interpretation of the foundational
religious texts is a recent and minority ideology that has captivated
the attention of certain sections of world Muslims. However, what
sustains that ideology as a threatening force to world peace and
stability is not its theological content per se but the political and
economic environment that surrounds it. This environment is the so
called NWO.
The
inequities and injustices embedded in NWO, especially in the Muslim
Middle East, is closely linked to the rise of Islamist militancy. It
is a pity that those who are demanding reforms in Islam do not seem to
comprehend this umbilical cord between Islamist militancy and NWO.
None
of the post-colonial Muslim Middle East regimes embraced the Islamist
ideology when they became independent. Only Saudi Arabia which was not
colonized declared Islam as its constitution with its ultraconservative
Wahhabi teachings. Even in the pre-colonial Ottoman Empire which
governed the territories of the post-colonial nations Islamism was not
the ruling ideology. Islam and Islamism became a rallying cry only when
the Ottomans faced an existential threat from the emerging Western
nations, especially from Britain and France.