A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Will the next ‘president’ stand up, please?
BY N Sathiya Moorthy-February 27, 2018, 12:00 pm
If
anyone wants any proof that much of the nation’s polity is shocked
beyond immediate recovery at the nation-wide local government (LG) poll
results, it is here. Despite their long years as election analysts,
whether or not they are parliamentarians and/or politicians, many of
them have continued to harp on the LG poll percentages of individual
political parties to argue that this man or that can or cannot become
President again. Unwittingly or otherwise, former President Mahinda
Rajapaksa is at the centre of many such claims, and most such
counter-claims (that he cannot return to power).
Leave aside all talks centred on LG poll-percentages, under 19-A,
Mahinda R just cannot contest a future presidential polls unless a
favourable Parliament amends the Constitution all over again, for him to
contest again. It is another matter after whether Mahinda would at all
want to try his luck again, after his misadventure mission of January
2015, for which he got 18-A passed to let him contest the presidency a
third time, and lost it, too.
It is even more doubtful if Mahinda R can ‘transfer’ all his votes from
the LG polls to a third candidate, who does not have the hallow of
war-victory around his head, now that brother Gota R has publicly
acknowledged that his status as a US citizen bars him from becoming
prime minister (hence, president, too). That is, even if such other
candidate of his choice is either of the other brothers, namely Chamal R
or Basil R, or going down the blood-line, parliamentarian-son, Namal R.
If someone was thus talking about Mahinda becoming prime minister under
the existing system, that is a plausible question, for which answers
have to be found within the present scheme, as long as all the allies
pitted against him in the presidential polls of 2015 did not re-unite
and are also able to create the ‘Maithiri magic’ of the times. Granted
that the 44.69 per cent of vote-share in the LG polls gives Mahinda and
the SLPP a seat-share advantage in any parliamentary polls (at least on
paper just now), he can hope to become prime minister, yes, or
post-poll, hope to have his nominee, named, instead.
Closest competitor, but..
In this, Mahinda’s closest competitor for prime minister, going again by
the LG polls, should be incumbent Ranil Wickremesinghe of the ‘rival’
UNP. But if the Constitution were to be amended for Mahinda, and the two
were to contest, Ranil with his UNP’s 32.61 per cent LG poll vote-share
is way behind. With Sirisena-led SLFP’s 4.48 per cent and the larger
UPFA’s 8.9 per cent (total 13.38 per cent), Ranil, would be marginally
ahead of Mahinda, at 45.99 per cent, or 1.3 per cent more.
Less said about Sirisena’s chance, whether he contests the presidency
with or without the UPFA’s support and as SLFP’s uncontested candidate.
If against the assumption that all of SLPP’s LG poll vote-share are
‘transferrable’ for Mahinda to give it away to any candidate of his
choice, and the UNP and the SLFP-UPFA were to bury the current
bickering, then Ranil could stake claims to contest the presidency, and
Sirisena would have no choice but to give in, even without a murmur of
the present kind.
The real difference between the winner and the loser in the presidential
polls of 2015 is not the vote-share of the present-day SLPP, which is
more than the Mahinda-centric, Maithiri-led SLFP-UPFA vote-share (42.38
per cent) in the parliamentary polls of 2015, and not much less than the
presidential poll figure (47.58 per cent) that he had lost earlier in
the year. To think that a leader without his original party of decades,
namely, the SLFP, and with no chance of becoming President in the future
or even hopes of being prime minister in the current Parliament without
engineering large-scale defections without being in power already (as
he did as President in his first term), Mahinda has done creditably
well. But it is only statistics, nothing more – just as it is nothing
less.
Considering that the UNP contested alone (or with a few allies but not
the official SLFP-UPFA) in the 2015 parliamentary polls, the party’s
vote-share has taken a beating now, from the then figure of 45.66 per
cent. An arithmetic possibility is that all of the SLFP and UPFA votes
(totalling 13.38 per cent) has gone away only from the UNP’s 2015
parliamentary vote-share, bringing Ranil leadership’s LG poll figure
closer to the residual 32.28 per cent (and very marginally higher at
32.62 per cent in reality).
‘Magic’ allies
Yet, none of this explains how Mahinda’s SLPP got more vote-share than
in the parliamentary polls, so has the JVP, 6.26 per cent, up from 4.87
per cent. Definitely, it has not come from the TNA, whose vote-share has
marginally gone down to 3.06 per cent now, from 4.62 per cent in the
parliamentary polls. The TNA does not share the same constituency and
region as either the SLPP or the JVP. More importantly, the TNA has
enough local, Tamil claimants to its falling vote-share.
For the mathematical wizards who added up past poll figures to argue
that Mahinda cannot make the presidency again in the same way have
forgotten not only the constitutional bar, but also their own
contribution to the defeat – and thus, UNP-backed Maithiri’s victory.
The TNA, JVP, SLMC and all other Muslim parties, and also their
Upcountry Tamil brethren (or, at least most of them other than the CWC
under Arumugan Thondaman) were the chief architects of the Mahinda
defeat – and thus, the consequent Maithiri victory. Yet, it is also some
leaders from these parties, apart from select motivated campaigners
from the UNP (thankfully not the SLFP-UPFA, as yet) who are pointing to
the SLPP’s LG vote-share to argue how Mahinda cannot become president
again (which the man too knows better, and may be planning to become
prime minister instead, a la Russia’s very own Vladimir Putin).
Preferential votes
Minus Mahinda who cannot anyway contest the presidency again as such,
and minus the possibilities of he being able to transfer everyone of the
SLPP’s LG poll-share (44.69), if not his own losing presidential
poll-share (47.58 per cent), who stands the best chance of winning the
next presidential polls, whenever held but not later than January 2020.
Guided only by the latest poll-figures available from the LG elections,
Ranil stands the best chance, or so would it seem. And it is just that
and nothing more.
Granting that the UNP nominates Ranil for presidency, and granting that
Ranil too readily accepts such nomination, and granting that all subdued
factions in the party work hard and together to have him at the top,
whatever the reason and justification, he would still require close to
18 per cent vote-share from the current LG figure, to make it to the
top. The theoretical question then remains if a Mahinda candidate with
all transferrable votes could fill the gap (6 per cent from LG polls and
three per cent from the 2015 presidential election) or Ranil with
32-plus per cent now, and 45-plus per cent from the parliamentary polls
of 2015.
If the TNA does not vote Ranil (or any other UNP nominee, either) and it
will not vote a Mahinda nominee anyway as things stand, and the JVP
would not have the UNP for ideological reasons, whoever the candidate,
where will the UNP’s extra votes for winning presidency come from? The
Muslims, the Upcountry Tamils, or who? It is a million-dollar question
for which no ready answers are available.
All these arguments pre-supposes the absence of two rounds of
‘preferential votes’ under the Sri Lankan scheme, if no candidate
obtains more than 50-per cent vote-share in the first round. It is a
trickier issue than acknowledged, and none of those that have since make
presidential poll projections based on the LG poll figures, have cared
to mention it, even in the passing.
It is even doubtful if any or all of the nation’s pollsters and those
imported from overseas could at all predict the result / fall-out of a
presidential poll, which is pushed into the preferential round. More
importantly, all their projections (!) and predictions (?) derived from
the LG poll results now are also based on the present turn-out (70 per
cent), which is much less than the presidential poll turn-out of 81.52
per cent, and the parliamentary poll figure of 77.68 per cent.
Who then said that a president is ready in waiting, and it is anyone but
Mahinda R, or all the Rajapaksas who have a dual citizenship, like
brother Gota R? If anything, it is Maithiripala Sirisena now, and it
could be anyone (else?) the next time round. It could be Maithiri again,
if and only if he is able to convince the SLPP voters and the Rajapaksa
clan that he would not do it again, and Rajapaksas too are able to
‘transfer’ all of their LG poll vote-share.
Amen!
(The writer is Director, Chennai chapter of the Observer Research
Foundation, the multi-disciplinary Indian public-policy think-tank,
headquartered in New Delhi. email: sathiyam54@gmail.com )