A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ec6f/9ec6f8fb90c47aa74435bbc86e9aad7d64411cf7" alt=""
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, July 3, 2018
Sri Lanka: CBK — The leader stands with victims
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e508/0e5087acf4eabc53f591b57f11b2530bef3363db" alt=""
birthday tribute to former President of Sri Lanka Madam Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, Chairperson of the Office for National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR)Madam Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga (CBK), an architect of reparation and restorative justice in Sri Lanka, is an essential political power player to be read and understood. Her political uniqueness, I believe, is centralized on the pain of victims’ of social repercussion regardless of their affiliations
( June 30, 2018, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) It
is her birthday June 29. She has turned seventy-three. A long journey.
She is one of the most important political personalities the country
ever produced but quite often, unfortunately, misunderstood by the
populist political culture prevailing in the present. That is indeed,
one of the most miserable missing links in the political culture in Sri
Lanka, where the substantive political reading on those who governed the
system is almost zero but negative criticisms or empty eulogizes are
common.
Those who governed the systems of the country produced various political
character in the history of Sri Lanka. There are various attempts to
find the uniqueness of those who ruled the country. None of the leaders
are inseparable from the violence which was inherent in the system for
many decades. There are handful of responsible parties who understood
the gravity of the violence which caused harm to the country and the
citizen. Understanding the violence is nothing but reading through the
victims’ perspective and standing with them is a rare ambition that
anyone could maintain. Reconciliation is meaningful social process when
the authority or political power has courage and discipline not to
stand for victims but standing with the victims.
Sri Lanka, an island nation has undergone through various stages of
violence resulting in losing unaccountable numbers of innocent lives.
Vanquishing political opponents and those who struggled against the
socio-economic depravity has been pretty much common political practice
in the country for decades. As it was in China during Mao’s regime, in
Sri Lanka too, kill the chicken scare the monkey was sort of motto used
to spread social fear. This nihilistic practice has led not to solve the
social problems but to further deepening the wounds of the nation by
making life meaningless and stressful mockery. Therefore it has led to
series of armed conflicts, which wiped out dynamic and creative
generations. The vacuum created after has never been filled.
But who has the ability to mourn them and take precautions to prevent
recurrence? Political culture was in such bad condition where the
victims of the conflicts were labeled as the things of the past.
When the system is refusing the facility to mourn for those who die, the
result is stereotyped prejudices embedded as the ruling elements of the
governing body of the nation. I believe, by and large, the missing link
of our political mechanism is prevailing in this aspect.
Are we a nation of inability to mourn? Why has our facility to mourn not
been nationalized but much politicized? A nation where hundreds of
thousands of men and women got buried in the spoil-soil hardly see a
national policy which applies to all equally and equity to mourning for
lost lives.
They lost for us, they left for us, and therefore we have the moral
responsibility to find justice and making their lives memorable. Who has
the courage to step forward and find the long lasting solution?
This is where, Madam Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga (CBK), an
architect of reparation and restorative justice in Sri Lanka, is an
essential political power player to be read and understood. Her
political uniqueness, I believe, is centralized on the pain of victims’
of social repercussion regardless of their affiliations.
By being a political victim, Madam understood the substance of
victimization of the citizen. First, by losing her father when she was a
school child, then as a wife of two kids losing the husband, later
narrowly escaping the assassination plot by the most ruthless and unfair
terror outfit, the Tamil Tigers, her life itself is narrative of
reparation and needfulness of restoration of justice. It is not easy
for anyone to go through such political complexity while experiencing
sublimes of solitude.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17cf4/17cf4d9c3568504f07607a79b169301c3c9708eb" alt=""
What, according to her political text one appreciates is that human pain
has no colour, race, ethnicity, caste, religious, class, etc. Tears
have no different taste as per personal diverties. Pain is common; tear
has the same taste. Understanding this common factor will be resourcing
and encouraging to change the attitude towards the pain of the victims
and understanding the agony she or he goes through.
By opening the society into greater political dialogue even by accepting
responsible parties of those who took loved one’s life, CBK’s political
wisdom led into finding the scientific meaning to the crimes that
occurred in the country. This tendency of finding every data of the
crimes by retrospective approach is one of the unique political
ambitions that CBK has revealed up to date. This is, I believe, the very
beginning of the practice of victimology in Sri Lankan context. There
are genuine ignorance on the part of various governments exercising
governing power to address and dig up the truth of the bitter and
violent past.
But, CBK’s political wisdom placed on the exact opposite of the
traditional political behaviours and attempted to address the root
causes of the disease without playing with symptoms by using rhetoric.
It is the beginning of the victimology in Sri Lanka.
Originating from a French word, victimologie,
victimology came into linguistic practice in the mid-50s. Many theories
based on the concept have been written and many attempted to understand
the legal point of view of this very subject by defining.
However, most of the debates were constrained in the academic community,
and it has hardly touched the ground. It is rare to read the political
understanding and genuine practice of victimology under political
authority. The political ideology of Madam Chandrika Bandaranaike was
able to put these theories into practice. Finding truth to deliver
justice was one of the main aims of her administrations, but distorted
political attitudes and desires of those within the administration who
sabotaged the greater effort.
Scientific examination of mass graves such as in Sooriyakanda mass grave
and Chemmani mass grave are not just politically motivated attempts to
win the voting base but serious steps taken to address the bitter truth
of the society from the retrospective approach – through lessons learnt
about ourselves. Those were the beginning of the practice of victimology
in Sri Lanka. This is where restorative justice has begun. But, later,
unfortunately, those who ruled the nation gave lesser priorities to this
very area and the nation lost the greater opportunity to be together.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d47e/1d47eae5ded93ffb047b5ac15e91c9a81d36b3c9" alt=""
A leader who can live with the truth is the leader who is willing to
find the truth. A leader who is willing to find the truth is the leader
who will be genuine in delivering justice. A leader who is genuine in
delivering justice is the leader who will never leave the victims but
stand with them. A leader who is standing with the victims is the leader
who will restore liberty of common man in the nation. A leader who is
ensuring liberty of common man is the leader of freedom. CBK is a leader
who fought for freedom of common man. But unfortunately, poor readings
of her political wisdom and strategies led many communities to have lame
viewpoints about something much deeper than met the eye.
In this context, I quote the sage words of late-Eli Wiesel to more
appropriately understand the depth of the political wisdom of CBK. Eli
Wiesel, a survivor of holocaust in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech
reads as follows;
“I swore never to be silent whenever human beings endure suffering and
humiliation. We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never
the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.
Sometimes we must interfere. When human lives are endangered, when human
dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become
irrelevant. Whenever men and women are prosecuted because of their race,
religion, or political views, that place must–at that moment–become the
center of the universe.”
We as a nation must be proud that we at least we have a handful of
people who are genuine in caring about others’ pain and they have
attempted to find justice for all by considering it as the need of the
moment. Strategies applied in the programs conducted by the Office for
National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR), established after the 2015
Presidential Election, is one of such institutional example out of
dozens.
Let me quote excerpts of the CBK’s speech at the inauguration of the
national consultation of ethnic reconciliation, Colombo, on July 26,
2002.
“ … I only wish to state that as the Head of State of this country but
even more so as a citizen of Sri Lanka who loves this country as dearly
as every one of you here, as a mother and as a woman who hopes that my
children and yours will no more be called upon to experience the horrors
that our generation was compelled to experience to live through in the
last 20 years of our history, and perhaps even more especially the last
20 years, the last 19 years to be most specific, will not have to live
through those experiences – and that they could look forward to a
brighter future for our country, a country in peace marching forward to
that destiny that all our peoples so richly deserve after all these
years of immense suffering, sadness and tears…”
The lady has proven that rectitude reconciliation without truth is
nothing but a farce. Therefore, CBK marches forwards to address the
truth by taking a retrospective approach to address the crimes committed
against unarmed men and women in this nation.
Let’s wish you a very happy birthday, Madam!