A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, October 9, 2018
With Kavanaugh confirmed, impeachment could follow. Here’s how.
Democrats opposed to Brett M. Kavanaugh's nomination say he's unfit to serve on the Supreme Court – and if they gain control of Congress they could impeach him. (Elyse Samuels, Patrick Martin/The Washington Post)
By Deanna Paul-October 6 at 4:11 PM
Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court has been confirmed.
A bitterly divided Senate confirmed President Trump’s nominee to a
lifetime appointment to the nation’s highest court on Saturday.
So what comes next?
In early September, even before the recent spate of sexual misconduct
allegations, murmurs among Kavanaugh opponents fixated on whether he had
lied under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Some Senate Democrats took to social media to air their ire and frustration.
One former deputy assistant U.S. attorney general, who previously
worked for a top Democrat, even called for Kavanaugh’s impeachment from
the federal judiciary.
“Much of Washington has spent the week focusing on whether Judge Brett
Kavanaugh should be confirmed to the Supreme Court,” Lisa Graves wrote
in a Slate column on Sept. 7, more than a week before the New Yorker published the then-anonymous sexual assault claims of Christine Blasey Ford.
“After the revelations of his confirmation hearings, the better
question is whether he should be impeached from the federal judiciary. I
do not raise that question lightly, but I am certain it must be
raised.”
Graves wrote that Kavanaugh had misled the Judiciary Committee about the stolen documents that
Graves had written as chief counsel for nominations for Sen. Patrick J.
Leahy (D-Vt.) when he was the chairman of the committee.
Kavanaugh, she wrote, “lied. Under oath. And he did so repeatedly.”
Therefore, she concluded, “he should not be confirmed. In fact, by his own standard, he should clearly be impeached.”
Senators react to FBI report following Kavanaugh investigation
Senators react to FBI report following Kavanaugh investigation
After reading the FBI report
into the allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh,
Republican and Democratic senators reacted on Oct. 4. (Monica Akhtar, Rhonda Colvin, Alice Li/The Washington Post)
Since Kavanaugh’s testimony about the Ford allegations, other lawmakershave voiced similar concerns about Kavanaugh’s “integrity” and “dishonesty.”
Graves told The Washington Post on Thursday that each time Kavanaugh
testifies, he has shown “only more proclivity to lie to the Senate.”
Impeachment proceedings would be contingent on Democrats regaining
control of the House, the only body that can bring an article of
impeachment.
Reps. Luis V. Gutiérrez (D-Ill.) and Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) have already flirted with the possibility of impeachment, and Axios recently noted that
“top Democratic operatives are already talking about impeachment of
Brett Kavanaugh as a 2020 campaign issue if he gets confirmed to the
Supreme Court,” adding, “A well-known Democratic strategist says the
‘only question is: Who calls for it first?’ ”
What is impeachment?
At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the delegates concluded that
even those holding the highest office would not be above the law,
birthing the American system of impeachment.
Under the Constitution,
the president, the vice president and “all civil Officers of the United
States” (including those in the executive branch, plus federal judges)
may be removed from office for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes
and misdemeanors.” The procedure for impeaching a president or a federal
judge is broadly the same.
There are two parts to the process:
The House is entrusted with the responsibility of voting on impeachment. Its members decide by a majority vote.
Then the Senate holds a trial for the underlying misconduct. A
conviction requires two-thirds of the Senate, or 67 votes. If there is a
conviction, the Senate removes the individual from office.
How likely is Kavanaugh’s impeachment?
“It’s as likely as the Democrats winning the House,” said Jed Shugerman, a professor at Fordham University School of Law.
“If they take back the House, I would be surprised if they don’t put
forth impeachment proceedings in the next Congress,” Shugerman told The
Washington Post.
“At the moment,” according to the Cook Political Report, “Democrats are substantial favorites for House control.”
Even then, though, Shugerman called Kavanaugh’s removal “exceedingly unlikely,” given the supermajority threshold in the Senate.
But there are 51 Republicans and 49 Democrats in the Senate, where Republicans maintain a 7-in-9 chance of
keeping control, according to FiveThirtyEight’s calculations — leaving
no window for the Democrats to gain a supermajority, even in a best-case
scenario.
The “supermajority” threshold for removal is exceedingly high by design: The delegates crafted
it to prevent politics from driving the outcome, instead ensuring any
misconduct was offensive enough to have bipartisan support for removal.
Nineteen federal officials — including 15 judges and two presidents —
have been impeached, but fewer than half have been removed by the
Senate, because of the supermajority standard.
The most famous cases resulted in impeachment but not removal.
Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were the only two presidents to be
impeached by the House. Each reached the Senate for trial, but both were
acquitted, Johnson by a single vote. Neither was removed from office.
Only one sitting Supreme Court justice — Samuel Chase — was impeached, on charges of being too partisan in 1805. As with Johnson and Clinton, Chase was acquitted by the Senate and continued to serve.
What are judges impeached for?
There isn’t a clear definition of “impeachable offense,” though
historically that is often framed by statutory felonies and involves a
significant abuse of power, according to Shugerman, an expert in constitutional law. “Current culture has also changed our understanding of what an abuse of power is,” he said.
In 1970, arguing for the impeachment of Justice William O. Douglas, then-Rep. Gerald Ford (R-Mich.)
defined impeachable offenses as “whatever a majority of the House of
Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history. …
Something less than a criminal act or criminal dereliction of duty may
nevertheless be sufficient grounds for impeachment.”
Douglas was never impeached; the hearings held by the House Judiciary
Committee produced no credible evidence and concluded without a vote.
What’s clear, however, is that perjury is a significant offense, especially for a judge.
The question of lying under oath is particularly important for someone
who would be or is a member of the judiciary, according to Graves, the
former Senate Judiciary Committee lawyer who called for Kavanaugh’s
impeachment.
A judge, she said, is a symbol of integrity and the law. To the extent
that a judge’s integrity is tainted, it disables that person from being
able to continue as a judge.
“Lawyers are officers of the court,” Graves told The Post. “Courts rule
on matters and assess witness credibility all the time, so honesty,
integrity and truthfulness are paramount qualities for a judge.”
This principle is evidenced by prior successful judicial impeachment proceedings:
Alcee L. Hastings was impeached and removed from the bench for perjury
in 1988. (Hastings now serves in Congress, as a Democrat representing
Florida’s 20th District.) Walter L. Nixon was impeached and removed for
lying to a grand jury in 1989. Most recently, Thomas Porteous Jr. was
impeached and removed for committing perjury on financial disclosures in
2010.
Clinton’s impeachment was also based on his alleged lying under oath
during a deposition, a proceeding that Kavanaugh was intimately familiar
with from his time working on special prosecutor Kenneth W. Starr’s
investigative team.
“Even though our political discourse has been defiled by the
proliferation of so many politicians' lies, the rules for testifying
under oath, whether it’s at the U.S. Senate, trial or deposition, is one
of the only sacred vows in a secular society. It should be taken
seriously because of that,” Graves said. "[Kavanaugh] certainly held
President Clinton to that standard. He’s not above the law any more than
the president is above the law.”
Now what?
Kavanaugh was confirmed Saturday — exactly one month before the midterm elections.
If Democrats take control of the House when the next Congress is sworn
in come January, it’s possible the House Judiciary Committee would
quickly move to investigate Kavanaugh and draft articles of impeachment.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who would chair the committee, has
already said he would support such an action.