Sunday 30 December 2018
RAMALLAH, occupied West Bank – In
the volatile reality of Israel’s ongoing occupation and campaign of
ethnic cleansing against Palestinians, the news cycle never stops. The
nightly military raids, arrests of young men, killing of civilians and
home demolitions have continued – as they have for the past 70 years.
But 2018 also saw substantial political changes that will keep this year etched in the memory of many Palestinians.
Many
believe that while Israel has merely continued to enact policies
consistent with its Zionist ideology, this year saw such practices
become even more flagrant.
“What
stood out the most in 2018 is that Israeli policies have become
completely overt,” Nisreen Elayyan, a Palestinian lawyer based in
Jerusalem, told Middle East Eye. “It no longer tries to disguise its
policies and goals, particularly with violating basic human rights.”
Here are the five biggest political events in the occupied Palestinian territory to have taken place this year.
Great March of Return in the Gaza Strip
Palestinians have been demonstrating for nine months near the fence separating Gaza from Israel (MEE/Mohammed al-Hajjar)
In
the ongoing Palestinian struggle for freedom, the Great March of Return
protests in the besieged Gaza Strip have been one of the biggest
developments of the year.
On
30 March, thousands of Palestinians in Gaza gathered on the boundary
with Israel in a mass demonstration movement known as the Great March of
Return.
The
demonstrations were organised to coincide with Land Day, which marks
the events of 30 March 1976 when Israeli police killed six Palestinian
citizens of Israel who were protesting against land theft.
The
Great March of Return, which continues until today, has called for the
right of return of Palestinian refugees to their homes, from which they
were expelled during the Nakba -
or catastrophe - amid the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948.
The protests also called for an end to the 11-year siege of Gaza and
Palestinians’ right to dignity and freedom.
READ MORE►
Some
two-thirds of Gaza’s two million inhabitants are refugees from towns
and cities in present-day Israel such as Jaffa and Asqalan - since
renamed Yafo and Ashkelon. The small Palestinian territory is highly
impoverished, with more than 80 percent of its population relying on
humanitarian aid.
Since
the beginning of the protests, Israeli forces have killed at least 230
Palestinians in the besieged coastal enclave - at least 190 of whom were killed during the March of Return demonstrations - and wounded more than 25,000 people.
“In
2018, we saw Israel continue its unlawful killing of demonstrators in
Gaza. Officers repeatedly fired on protesters who posed no imminent
threat to life, pursuant to expansive open-fire orders from senior
officials that contravene international human rights law standards,”
Omar Shakir, the Israel and Palestine director for Human Rights Watch,
told MEE.
Israel passes Nation-State law
Demonstrators attend a rally to protest against the nation-state bill in Tel Aviv on 14 July 2018 (AFP)
On
19 July, the Israeli parliament, known as the Knesset, passed the
nation-state bill into its Basic Law - Israel’s equivalent to a
constitution - affirming that the right to national self-determination
in the state of Israel was “unique to the Jewish people”, a move decried
by rights groups and Palestinians alike as an apartheid policy.
The nation-state law also
states that Israel “views the development of Jewish settlement as a
national value, and shall act to encourage and promote its establishment
and strengthening” - despite settlements being deemed illegal under
international law.
For
Jamal Zahalqa, a Palestinian-Israeli member of the Knesset, the law’s
passing was the most important development of 2018 for Palestinians,
especially Palestinian citizens of Israel, who make up some 20 percent
of the country’s population.
“What
Israel did is transfer the concept of the nation-state law from the
state to the cities,” Zahalqa told MEE. “The law indicates that
settlements are not a choice for the state, but it is the state’s
obligation. Today, the law forces the state to encourage and financially
support settlements.”
READ MORE►
Zahalqa pointed to the Israeli town of Afula, whose municipality has openly pushed to “preserve the Jewish character”
of the city following the passage of the nation-state law, “meaning
that they would prevent Palestinians from living there and from entering
the public parks there”.
“This
law gives legality to the occupation, to the Judaisation of Jerusalem.
It opens the door for much more. We must monitor the implementation of
this dangerous law in 2019.”
Shakir
agreed with the MK: “In 2018, we saw the further entrenchment of the
two-tiered discriminatory system that treats Palestinians unequally -
not only in the West Bank but also inside Israel proper.
“The
nation-state law enshrined as a constitutional mandate Jewish supremacy
over non-Jews, which has effectively guided Israeli policy for years.”
Trump moves US embassy to Jerusalem
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the US embassy opening on 14 May (Reuters)
On
6 December 2017, US President Donald Trump broke with decades of
American policy towards the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and recognised
Jerusalem as the capital of Israel - announcing that his country would
move its embassy from Tel Aviv to the holy city.
On
14 May, which marked the 70th anniversary of the Nakba - and Israel’s
Independence Day - the US moved its embassy to Jerusalem, infuriating
the diplomatic community.
Due
to Jerusalem's importance to followers of the three Abrahamic
religions, the city's status has long been the main sticking point in
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Israel
occupied the eastern half of the city, which houses the Old City and
religious landmarks such as the al-Aqsa Mosque compound, the Church of
the Holy Sepulchre and the Western Wall, in 1967. It then proceeded to
annex Jerusalem in contravention of international law, and in 1980
proclaimed it as its "eternal, undivided capital".
Until
Trump’s move, Israel's control and sovereignty over the city had not
been recognised by any country in the international community, and all
embassies were based in Tel Aviv.
READ MORE►
In
the wake of the US decision Guatemala and Paraguay also moved their
embassies to Jerusalem - although Paraguay later rescinded the move. A
number of politicians in other countries have also since called for
their states to follow suit.
Palestinian
leadership, which has long called for the establishment of a
Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital as part of a
two-state solution, saw Trump's declaration and embassy move as a fatal
blow to the already stalled peace process.
Elayyan
said the transfer of the embassy ”implicitly translated into an
encouragement for Israel to continue and intensify its racist policies
against Palestinians in the city”.
“The
state has employed more violence, became bolder and was encouraged to
transfer more Israelis into Palestinian neighbourhoods in Jerusalem,”
she explained.
In
the long term the embassy move, Elayyan said, will have “many adverse
political dimensions on the Palestinian people - both inside and outside
Palestine”.
She
added that the move would make it much more difficult in the future to
establish a Palestinian state, especially if other countries followed
suit.
Israel attempts to demolish Khan al-Ahmar village
Israeli policemen detain a Palestinian girl in Khan al-Ahmar, West Bank on 4 July 2018 (Reuters)
In
2018, the Palestinian Bedouin village of Khan al-Ahmar, east of
Jerusalem in the occupied West Bank, came under threat of demolition by
Israeli authorities - and saw solidarity pour in from local and
international activists and diplomats.
The
village, home to some 200 residents and an eco-friendly school that
serves children from surrounding communities, stands in the way of
Israel’s plans to create a contiguous bloc of illegal settlements in the
central West Bank just east of Jerusalem.
Due
to Khan al-Ahmar’s strategic location in the last corridor between the
occupied West Bank and Jerusalem, Israel’s demolition would mean the
division of the West Bank in half - and the final nail in the coffin of
the two-state solution.
READ MORE►
When
Israeli bulldozers have approached the village, activists and residents
stood their ground and blocked soldiers from razing the community to
the ground; many were beaten and arrested.
Several
European governments and human rights organisations said the demolition
of the village would constitute a war crime though the forcible
displacement of an occupied civilian population.
“The
problem of Khan al-Ahmar is bigger than the village itself. It is about
the establishment of a Palestinian state. The so-called peace efforts
depend on this village. If this village is demolished, then the
Palestinian dream crumbles,” Eid Khamis, the community spokesperson and
leader, wrote for MEE earlier this year.
It
remains unclear whether the demolition will take place in 2019, but
activists have kept a close eye on the situation, monitoring any
developments.
Rights
groups have warned that if Israel succeeds in destroying Khan al-Ahmar,
at least 8,000 other Palestinians in similar communities may face the same fate.
Airbnb announces it will remove listings from Israeli settlements
A
road sign points towards an Airbnb apartment, located in the Esh Kodesh
outpost, near the Jewish settlement of Shilo and the Palestinian
village of Qusra in the occupied West Bank on 20 November 2018 (AFP)
In
November, the global online rental marketplace Airbnb announced it
would begin a process to remove listings from illegal Israeli
settlements in the occupied West Bank.
"We
concluded that we should remove listings in Israeli settlements in the
West Bank that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and
Palestinians," Airbnb said in a statement.
"US
law permits companies like Airbnb to engage in business in these
territories. At the same time, many in the global community have stated
that companies should not do business here because they believe
companies should not profit on lands where people have been displaced,"
the statement read.
"We know that people will disagree with this decision and appreciate their perspective. This is a controversial issue."
Airbnb has since been pressured by Israel to rescind its decision.
READ MORE►
Human rights groups have long
shamed Airbnb and other companies for doing business in the occupied
Palestinian territories, exposing how it contributes to a two-tiered
system of discrimination.
“Airbnb
took the only course of action that it could to comply with its
responsibilities under the UN guiding principles on business and human
rights - not to directly facilitate and profit from rights abuse,” said
Shakir of Human Rights Watch.
“I
think its an important message - not only to other businesses that
continue to do business in and with settlements, but also to the Israeli
government - that the international community will not be a party to
the abuses associated with its ongoing ugly occupation of the West
Bank.”