Attorney General William P. Barr is expected to miss House Democrats’
deadline to provide Congress the full report documenting special counsel
Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation into Russian interference in the
2016 election, increasing the likelihood lawmakers will subpoena the
Justice Department.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), the chairman of the House Judiciary
Committee, said that during a Wednesday phone call with Barr, the
attorney general said it would be “weeks, not months” before lawmakers
can see the report, making it “apparent that the department will not
meet the April 2 deadline that we set” earlier this week.
Barr would not promise that “an unredacted full report with the
underlying documents, evidence, would be provided to Congress and to the
American people,” Nadler said. “We’re not happy about that, to put it
mildly.”
Though Nadler would not say whether lawmakers will issue a subpoena, he
told reporters that April 2 was “a hard deadline that we set and we mean
it.”
A Justice Department spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Post's Matt Zapotosky
explains why Attorney General William P. Barr's decision to not charge
President Trump with obstruction could raise new questions. (Monica Akhtar/The Washington Post)
Barr informed Congress on Sunday of Mueller’s main findings, writing in a
four-page letter to the heads of the House and Senate Judiciary
committees that the special counsel did not establish a criminal
conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to sway the election
and offered no conclusion on whether the president sought to obstruct
justice during the investigation.
The report is several hundred pages — but less than 1,000, Nadler said —
and Democrats say it is vital to see its details before they can
determine whether they agree with Barr’s assessment, believing there may evidence of collusion Mueller did not consider as part of his findings.
On the question of obstruction, Barr wrote in his summary for lawmakers
that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein had decided the
evidence was “not sufficient” to conclude Trump had “committed an
obstruction-of-justice offense.” Nadler said he did not discuss with
Barr why he made that determination, but Democrats have vowed to look
further into the evidence.
Barr pledged he would make himself available for an interview with the
Judiciary Committee, Nadler told reporters, which would happen
“reasonably soon.” Barr is expected on Capitol Hill for a budget hearing
with the House Appropriations Committee on April 9.
House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) called for the release of the full
Mueller report and brushed off GOP calls for him to resign. (Reuters)
“We may very well want Mueller after Barr,” Nadler added.