A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, April 3, 2019
The world could learn from Jacinda Ardern’s leadership on gun control
NEW ZEALAND’s response to the Christchurch mass-shooting shows that a
country can find unity, rather than division, on gun reform.
Strong and definitive leadership, a balanced approach to reforming gun
laws, and establishing a consensus that includes elements of the
gun-owning community are key themes of the debate that other countries
would do well to replicate.
What remains to be seen, however, is how social media companies can
better ensure that their networks are not used to inspire, coordinate,
or disseminate extremist behaviour.
Just six days after the worst terrorist atrocity in Kiwi history, New
Zealand decided that there was no need for a peaceful public to be armed
with MSSAs (military-style semi-automatics).
These are now banned,
demonstrating how a well-armed society with a strong gun culture can
nevertheless act responsibly in the face of a divisive act.
The accused attacker used firearms to inflame debate and
divide countries struggling with gun control. In New Zealand, it had
the opposite effect, inspiring a conclusion on gun control laws.
They need to be stronger.
This conclusion came not only due to disgust with the atrocity, but also
thanks to a set of progressive decisions and principles established by
New Zealand’s governance bodies. The world, and particularly the US,
would do well to understand how New Zealand brought about such unanimous
reform.
The effect of PM Jacinda Ardern’s remarkable leadership cannot be
understated. Ardern transformed a crisis into action. Without delay, she
took the time needed to genuinely face Christchurch’s Muslim community.
Her demeanour reminded the world that this tragedy was a national one,
and reaffirmed that the victims were a part of Kiwi society – fellow
citizens to be fought for. In doing so, she set a strong moral basis for
the work to come.
Furthermore, by refusing to acknowledge the
terrorist, Ardern removed a poisonous element from the subsequent
discourse. No time was lost pondering the unremarkable backstory of the
accused, and a message was sent that such acts will only earn you a
nameless existence in a nameless cell. Even the media would do well to
follow Ardern’s example.
The Prime Minister’s strong values allowed for decisive action. New
Zealand, along with the US, is one of the few high-income countries in
the world to have a permissive atmosphere for civilian gun ownership.
Guns are common in Kiwi civilian life due to hunting and agrarian
pastimes. In New Zealand, responsible gun use is perfectly legitimate.
By only targeting MSSAs, Ardern’s government chose a balanced approach
to gun reform that could succeed. Her efforts would have been wasted
with a knee-jerk and over-reaching approach. This would have threatened
the country’s gun-owners and moved them to act against it. Instead, no
one questioned a reform targeting only the class of weapon used in the
attack.
While New Zealand still lacks a registry for its civilian firearms, it
nevertheless established a precedent of meaningful, consensus-based
reform. This can form a basis for further legislative efforts to promote
a responsible gun culture.
Finally, the success of these reforms was due to the ability of Kiwi gun
owners to accept them. Gun control advocates ought to remember that
reform can only succeed when it is agreed upon by the owners themselves.
It must also be remembered that most gun owners are practitioners and
supporters of responsible ownership. Limiting reform efforts to MSSAs
was palatable to many gun owners, especially in the aftermath of such
egregious misuse.
Yet there was and will always be gun owners who will resist even the
most modest controls. For this, the vehicle for success was civil
society groups that represent gun owners or an aspect of ownership.
The stance taken by Federated Farmers,
for instance, was exemplary. It speaks volumes that an organisation
representing a prominent gun-owning group chose to support reform, even
knowing it would be unpopular among certain members.
Furthermore, the Police Association – that has long advocated for
increased gun control measures – supported reform efforts by deflating
the claim that widespread civilian gun ownership makes society safer.
Underlying the atrocity is a bigger issue than gun control. What was
uniquely unsettling about this shooting was the role online sub-cultures
and social media had in propagating it.
New Zealand is right to criminally punish those who spread the footage
of the attack, though the reality is that Facebook currently offers an
ungovernable broadcasting platform to terrorists and other subversive
actors seeking to disseminate propaganda. Other websites, such as ‘the Chans’, accommodate online communities that celebrate extremism and foment these attacks.
Social media and online forum providers are thus critical stakeholders
in the repetition and continuity of mass shootings, and therefore must
be commissioned to monitor and limit the channels through which
terrorist veneration and incitement of violence take place.
Only leadership, as shown in New Zealand, can form the broad base of
consensus required to respond to attacks like this. The prime minister’s
actions in the wake of this traumatic event have brought together a
nation faced with an act designed to tear its people apart. Leaders the
world over must follow suit.
By combining decisive action on gun control with strategies for limiting
hate speech on online media, governments can put themselves in a
position to limit violent terrorism in their societies. Christchurch
shows us that they must.
By Michael Picard, Research Director for GunPolicy.org of the University of Sydney’s School of Public Health. This piece was first published at Policy Forum, Asia and the Pacific’s platform for public policy analysis and opinion.