A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, June 3, 2019
The yellow spines
Back home in Ratmalana, I have around 10 years worth of National
Geographic magazines stacked on a bookshelf. My father subscribed to the
magazine when I was in school. I haven’t yet asked him what drove him
to do this, but I am grateful. Every year, the magazine sent subscribers
a world map. The beautifully printed Mercator projection distorted
size, but opened exciting new geographic possibilities to a kid who had
never travelled out of Sri Lanka.
Here I could see boundaries I hadn’t realised existed, as they
mysteriously snaked their way across continents - sometimes following
terrain and topography, but at most times an arbitrary logic no
different to an unthinking scribble. I didn’t understand then and don’t
fully understand now how these borders all came to be made. But long
before the vagaries of politics entered consciousness, the size of the
map in relation to myself at the time gave a sense of how big the world
beyond my room was. It isn’t a feeling digital media consumed on lap or
palm is able to fully recreate now. Capitols, rivers, mountains, seas,
cities, countries, roads and routes, harbours and hinterlands all came
alive through a cartographic precision the magazine staked its
reputation on.
And then there was the photography. Long before I started to appreciate
photography as a medium or art, it was the message. The photographs in
the National Geographic were, and still are, a visual feast. Critiques
of this early, exoticisinggaze or framing are now abundant and valid,
but again, to a child of the 80s who had never set foot out of the
country and whose only other visual teleportation device was a 21" Sony
Trinitron TV with two channels, the magazine’shigh-quality photos on
glossy print were utterly captivating. From tribe to terrain, country to
community, valley to village, each issue was a private portal into
lands and landscapes I never thought I would see. Some of what I first
saw on the magazine’s pages, I have now visited and witnessed in real
life.
Many more palaces and people, I will never visit or meet. I realise now
how little the father could afford the subscription, but continued with
it nevertheless to bring lands to me, he could not afford to send me to.
The value of this is lost on the young reader and child. But later in
life, I can draw a direct link to what I love the most – travel within
and beyond Sri Lanka, getting lost, mindful photography, unspoilt nature
as well as mindfully constructed urban landscapes – to the framing of
the National Geographic.
There was also something more. Whether the magazine set out to do it
consciously, or whether for the reader, it was a more subliminal
connection between stories and issues over the months and years, the
National Geographic rendered the complexity, fragility and
inter-connected nature of life on Earth. This is the most obvious thing
now and even fashionable to tout. In the 1980s, clean energy,
environmentalism, conservation, global warming and climate change
weren’t issues and hadn’t even entered the popular imagination or
political firmament.
We didn’t know or associate those richer in experience and wealth who
could tell us stories of their lives and travels. We couldn’t afford to
explore extensively within Sri Lanka, save for the annual pilgrimages to
places where religion or relatives lived. Without any of the
affordances now a thumb press, page load, click, flick, call or budget
flight away, the magazine laid the foundation of appreciating, many
years later, the complexity of ecosystems, essential fragility of nature
and, importantly, our place in – not above – all this.
All this came back to me on Thursday evening, as I listened to a lecture
by the legendary Jane Goodall. Some years ago, I listened to Maya
Angelou in New York, speak about her life and then recite, as her final
flourish,Still I Rise. I still get goosebumps at just the memory of her
voice. Goodall, last week, offered a comparable experience, in a very
different way. The two women are nothing like each other. Goodall’s
diminutive figure in real life hides over six decades of experience
bursting with insight, stories, forewarning and despite all she’s seen,
hope.
At a meet and greet session before the formal lecture, she appeared with
what appeared to be a single malt in a cut glass, perched herself on a
high-chair and then signed various things for over an hour. Each person
present was entitled to a professionally taken photo with her, but the
usher warned us she would only look up for groups of two or more. By
coincidence in the company of staff from the Jane Goodall Institute in
Wellington, I learnt that she spent 300 days of the year travelling to
events, fund-raisers, lectures and other meetings. The toll on the eyes
of an 85 year old woman of constant flash photography was just too much
to bear, but as luck would have it, the photographer informed me that
she had blinked when he clicked my photo with her. Sheepishly moving
back to her side, I told Goodall that at her age, she must find all of
us, and all of this, a bloody nightmare.
I may have also used a mild expletive. Goodall loosened up, chuckled and
through her smile for the photo, looking away from camera and straight
at me, confessed it was bloody tortuous. My first and only conversation
with the world’s greatest living anthropologist and primatologist was
thus anchored to a honest appraisal of how little she enjoyed endless
meetings with her giddy fans and ardent, loving followers.
How could one but not feel partial to and equally pained by this? I was
told however that Goodall was very partial to dogs – something she
hinted at in her lecture as well, when speaking about how animals
showcase a range of emotions and social behaviour that were once
ascribed only to humans.
Her lecture was pure magic – effortlessly enthralling, fearless,
fascinating and profoundly moving. Aside from her life with and work
around primates, Goodall also stressed the importance of addressing
poverty as integral to and inextricably entwined with habitat
preservation.
The choices she said that were made by affluent families around ethical
goods and services were not those possible in poverty, where the cost of
food mattered far more than source or how it was produced. Echoing
David Attenborough, she spoke of how we were all part of larger systems
where the loss or displacementof one species had a direct correlation
with the health and well-being of humans.
Goodall’s holistic approach, which grounded the importance of
environmental protection in frameworks that the disempowered and poor
could also identify with, is what drives her work with communities and
children.And while many would have latched on to what she said about her
activism, I was more intrigued by what she said about her mother.
When girls and women continue to face derision today for taking up
science, technology and medicine, she spoke of how her mother had been
pivotal in supporting her choice to become what she was today – never
doubting or shouting, quietly supportive, resilient, sacrificing much to
ensure she had what she needed to pursue her dreams.
I have asked my parents to never give away those National Geographic
magazines, which remain where I left them after I moved away from
Ratmalana. Though the spines are now a faded yellow, and in various
stages, succumbing to humidity, the pages remain in pristine condition.
They are my Goodall. They are my Attenborough. They are my treasure.
They are life.