A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, November 24, 2019
Mr President! Veer Away From The Previous ‘Rajapaksa Racist-Corrupt’ Legacy!


GR’s remarks raised fears among the minority Tamils and Muslims who are
already weighed down by apprehension of a return to anti-minority
attacks by Buddhist extremists, which were rampant during
the Rajapaksa regime. He said at the inauguration; ‘We
knew right from the beginning that the Sinhala Buddhists of this
country will be behind my victory. Although I knew I would be voted in
by the Sinhala Buddhists, I expected the Tamils and Muslims to also be
part of my victory. But my expectations were not met. Yet, as your new
president I request you again to join hands with me for the future
development of this country’. Besides, every single racist leader in
the country are with him, so the minorities fear that the racists will
have complete control over the next government. The
Tamils specifically fear the new president’s nationalistic policies
could mean renewed abuse of minorities, as the Tamil votes around the
country went almost exclusively to his opponent Sajith. People who have
not voted for GR are continuing to be apprehensive because a rather
racist line is being pursued by the media and others who supported him.
The celebrations too had a racist element to them. Even social media was
flooded with posts accusing the Tamils, Muslims and Sinhalese of
casting “racist votes” by voting to his opponents. Abusive posts on
social media were also directed against the Negombo Sinhalese Christians
too who voted against GR in numbers.
However, GR, Sajith and Anura are all Sinhala-Buddhists. It is thus
unfair to attribute a “racist” dimension to the minority votes. On
economic matters, both GR and Sajith were probably on the same page, but
in regard to minority issues, many felt that Sajith was more
forthcoming in this campaign, while Anura referred to his program being
devoid of racial connotations. People are entitled to make their
democratic choice and as long as their vote has been validly cast, it
must be accepted. Also, even Sinhala people voted for GR not purely on
his racist agenda; rather many people who voted for him have done so
because of their disappointment with the performance of Yahapalana
government.
To the Rajapakse dynasty, power through any source was the ultimate
dream. It was then Mahinda as the President, Basil as the Minister in
charge of the economic powerhouse, Chamal as the Speaker and GR as the
powerful Secretary of Defence. Now it is GR as President, Mahinda as PM
and Chamal as a Minister for a start. Their past brand of nepotism and
sycophantism, authoritarianism and racism bled the country of the much
needed peace (not absence of war) and harmony, justice, economic
independence and rule of law in Post war Sri Lanka. GR took the lead in
the defeat of the Tigers along with his brother and Sarath Fonseka.
However, his post-war campaign made the Tamils to feel as a defeated
race, who deserved only to be treated as such and marginalized them
,leaving the weak TNA to exploit their agony to remain in power. Then
GR, as the sponsor of Bodu Bala Sena, a rabid communal Buddhist outfit
bent on degrading Lord Buddha’s preachings of peace and non-violence ,
he proceeded to marginalize the Muslims, who were living in harmony in
the southern parts of Sri Lanka with the Sinhalese. He cultivated the
whole gamit of anti-Muslim hate through a set of monks like BBS
Gnanasaras, Sihala Ravaya Dayaratnes and Ravana Balaya Saddhatissas ,
who indulged in acts of violence and rowdyism which even the hardened
criminals will envy and think twice to commit. E.g. Damaging and
destroying mosques and defiling their sanctity, destroying business
businesses, butchering a Buddhist monk preaching peace and cutting of
his genital part etc. These are the acts meant to protect Buddhism and
its principles ,which myself and millions of others follow in this
blessed Island. The deplorable part of these acts is the active and
passive support lent by the law enforcement authorities and security
forces then, who were supposed to protect the citizens and their
property who obviously were following the instructions of GR to assist,
encourage and participate in the violent acts. Even the Sinhala Buddhist
population who opposed him was not spared of his high handed actions.
Rajapaksas thus made Sri Lanka, as a state of lawlessness and racism.
Unfortunately, this anti-Muslim tirade continued during the Yahapalana
times too, as the Sirisena and Ranil duo were both weak, impotent and imbecile.
The country has now voted in the SLPP to power and GR is the President
of all. It is foolhardy on his part to divide the votes cast for him as
Sinhala, Muslim and Tamil votes. When Barak Obama was voted to power in
US, no one did an analysis of how many Whites and how many Blacks voted
for him. In Sri Lanka, this stupidity happens. Therefore
this election polarized the entire nation and divide the integrity as
never before and GR confirmed it in his Presidential speech. The cats are getting out of the bag, when we hear hate groups sponsored by
GR are making public statements that their mission is accomplished and
will be disbanded. In their view, Dutugemunu is re-born in the person of
GR who will install a Sinhala Buddhist State in Sri Lanka as envisioned
by Anagarika. This is the brand of Sinhala Buddhist supremacy which
brought disaster to Sri Lanka even after seven decades of Independence,
making both Tamils and Muslims second class citizens. GR appears to
rekindle that philosophy, looking at the starting phase of his rule.
Looking at the caretaker cabinet of Ministers formed by GR, it is disconcerting to say the least. Die hard racists, thugs and
corrupts like Wimal, Gammampila, Johnston and incompetents like
Siripala De Silva, Rambukwella and Bandula G are in, contrary to GR’s
oft quoted statement that his team will be at least corrupt
free (not racist free); Not mentioning Mahinda’s corrupt record. Also
GR used his Presidential immunity to cover his own misdeeds and even
extricate himself. GR also faces several war crimes accusations from the
international community too, including the United Nations Human Rights
Council, for actions during the last phases of the war. Even civil
servants like Gamini Senerath and Lalith Weeratunga who were charged
with corrupt charges earlier have come back and/or exonerated. I wonder how GR is going to carry out his plans to rid the
corruption and strengthen the rule of law when his start of the journey
is itself tainted and polluted and goes against the hallowed principles
of law?
As ICJ reported once, ‘Sri Lanka is facing a crisis of impunity. It is
increasingly difficult, in fact nearly impossible, for people who have
suffered serious violations of their human rights to receive justice and
accountability. Victims and survivors do not receive redress, and
perpetrators are not brought to justice. The absence of justice removes
an important deterrent to future perpetrators’. This impunity crisis is
expected to continue in worst forms, judging by the developments in the
first week itself.
Globally too, the past decade has seen a worrying resurgence of racist
ideologies. Earlier this year, the UN Special Rapporteur on racism, E.
Tendayi Achiume, warned that “globally, racial equality is under
attack”. Secretary-General António Guterres has urged member states to
protect human rights, saying: “We are increasingly seeing the perverse
phenomenon of populism and extremism feeding off each other in a frenzy
of growing racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim hatred and
other forms of intolerance.”Fear of the other increasingly dominates the
political discourse in countries from Austria to Australia, India to
Israel, South Africa to Sweden, India to Sri Lanka, as ultra-nationalist
parties have encouraged leaders from across the political spectrum to
adopt insular and exclusionary policies. Sri Lanka too is no exception.
Whether GR will become another Trump or another Arden (of NZ) is a choice? This
GR regime can make a difference without following their previous
legacy, if only there is political will on his part. He should rid his
circle of racist advisors and proponents and restore confidence on the
political opponents as well as minorities. Democracy demands that all
are heard and allowed to speak and express their views without
government’s iron hand closing their mouths. Rule of law and process of
justice should be allowed to function without any restrictions and
government interference. All corrupts too should be kept out of the administration.
While the vast majority of Sinhala Buddhists embrace rationalistic
values and are amenable to sharing power with the minorities,
nationalistic forces within the community continue to subsume moderate
voices. Unfortunately Sri Lanka suffers from the ‘Saffron robe ailment’
which keeps those in power to subscribe to Sinhala Buddhist supremacism.
In this context, minorities having an equitable stake in governance
will be extremely challenging in view of this reality. This is not
insulting to the significant number of Bikkhus who preach the peaceful
religion of Buddhism. The involvement of Buddhist monks in politics
following independence in 1948, in effect, has already transformed
Buddhism into a highly politicised religion. Since independence,
Buddhist interest lobbies have been active in politics and politicians
seek the support of organised Buddhist groups as well as the clergy at
elections and their presence at ceremonies. Similarly, Buddhist
institutions too depend on the state, thus making the relationship a
deeply symbiotic one. In Buddhism Betrayed, Stanley J. Tambiah draws
attention to the paradox between Buddhism’s non-violent philosophy and
the high degree of political violence in Sri Lanka. He argues that the
political activities of the bhikkus did not advance democracy and
universalism but promoted a narrow and exclusive ethno-religious,
nationalist ideology. Therefore, even if the phenomenon of political
Buddhism existed in some form prior to arrival of the colonial powers,
it gained traction as an ideology emphasising Buddhist supremacy and
minority subordination in the post-independence period with entry of
monks into electoral politics.