A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, November 20, 2019
The President Of All Who Voted For & Against Him
President Gotabaya Rajapaksa scored an
impressive victory at the hotly contested presidential election winning
52.5 percent of the vote when the general expectation was that a second
preference count would be necessary as no candidate could get more than
50 percent of the vote. President Rajapaksa’s victory has debunked the
theory that victory at a presidential election necessarily requires the
support of the ethnic and religious minorities. It has at the same time
shown the existence of an acute polarization, and wound, in the body
politic that needs healing.
One of the main reasons given for supporting the institution of the
executive presidency was that it enabled the minorities to have a say in
the election of the president and thereby induce the president to be
more sensitive to their interests. But President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s
election campaign, and the election result itself, demonstrated how
appealing to the ethnic majority’s sense of being threatened and of
being sidelined could unify the ethnic majority population to vote
cohesively. The challenge to the new president would be to heal this
division that has grown wider since the Easter Sunday bomb attacks six months ago.
The prioritization of national security in the election campaign of
President Rajapaksa had popular support in the context of the Easter
Sunday bombing which signified a security failure on the part of the
government and its leadership. This attack gave renewed life to the
existential fears of the ethnic majority who saw the problem of Islamic
extremism, and its violence, as extending beyond the shores of Sri
Lanka. President Rajapaksa’s election campaign gave reassurance to this
sense of insecurity. However, this also enabled the president’s
political opponents to evoke fear in the ethnic and religious minorities
that this priority to national security would translate into oppression
against them.
In this context, President Rajapaksa is to be complimented for his
victory speech, where he said he was the president not only of those who
voted for him but also those who voted against him, irrespective of
which race or religion they belonged to. The election results showed
that the ethnic and religious minorities voted for the new president in
low proportions. But the fact is that the minorities voted for a
presidential candidate who was also from the majority ethnic community,
and whose campaign addressed their needs, rather than for a minority
candidate.
Urgent Tasks
Ethnic and religious divides is not a new or recent phenomenon nor is it
special to Sri Lanka. Like in many other countries such as in Northern
Ireland, Serbia and Israel, these divisions go back several hundred
years if not more. The Mahavamsa,
the great chronicle of Sinhalese history, records as one of its central
themes, the protection of Buddhism and the Sinhalese race from Tamil
invasions originating from South India. This memory would be re-invoked
by the oath taking of President Rajapaksa at the Ruvanvaliseya in
Anuradhapura, which is the sacred Buddhist temple built by the hero king
of the Sinhalese, Dutugemunu, nearly two thousand years ago, following his defeat of the Tamil king, Elara.
As the Defense Secretary at the time of the defeat of the LTTE in 2009,
the oath taking of President Rajapaksa at this sacred religious site has
a symbolic resonance with the past which could also be used for the
purposes of furthering national reconciliation. The Mahavamsa records
that after winning the war, Dutugemunu treated his dead foe’s remains
with respect and ordered the building of a tomb which no one should pass
except on foot.
One of the urgent tasks for President Rajapaksa would be to shape and
implement policies that will give confidence to the ethnic and religious
minorities that they will be treated as equal citizens without
discrimination and protected accordingly. Many of them, especially
Tamils, have a memory of the period of war when national security
considerations took priority over other considerations in the face of LTTE attacks and the possibility of terrorism.
The post-war period saw organized attacks on Muslims, which the
government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa failed to prevent or to take
action against those who engaged in the violence. Indeed it was believed
to have been supportive of some of the Sinhalese extremist groups that
behaved violently. During the election campaign these memories were
brought to the fore by the election propaganda on both sides of the
political divide.
There are two major concerns that the minorities will have that need to
be addressed. The first is their fear for their personal security and
their security as a community. This is reflected in SLMC leader
Rauff Hakeem’s congratulatory message to the new president. He said,
“The most urgent priority would be to maintain law and order, respect
rule of law and nurture the country’s pluralistic and democratic
values.” Apart from their security concerns, the minorities also want
the democratic space to further their political rights, which the Tamil
people in particular have been doing for the past seven decades since
Independence.
New Vision
The issue of personal and community security will be easier to ensure
today than it was in the past. The war is now ten years into the past.
During the past five years the people enjoyed a great improvement in
their freedom from fear which was partly due to the restraint of former
President Maithripala SIrisena and
the government, which led to the strengthening of institutions
including the police, Human Rights Commission and judiciary. This needs
to continue by ensuring that the rule of law functions and the police
and judiciary act independently without political interference. These
actions at the higher levels can be supplemented by actions at the
community level, such as the strengthening of district and local level
inter-religious councils, which are supported by the police along with
support of the local government officials and community leaders.