A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Friday, May 1, 2020
Nepal: The Drama Of Two Ordinances
This drama concerns two ordinances- one related to the political parties and the other on the Constitution Council.
In the midst of the global pandemic- the Wuhan Virus and Nepal’s
vulnerability, Prime Minister Oli brought in two controversial
ordinances unrelated to the management of the Virus and he had to
withdraw them in five days hurriedly when he found his own senior
leaders and the regular opposition were up in arms against the
ordinances.
The move was certainly against Constitutional propriety and is an
assault on democracy. In the process there was a widespread feeling that
Oli was instrumental in kidnapping one of the Opposition MPs to
Kathmandu from Janakpur to engineer a split in the Terain Samajbadi
Party. It looks that Oli’s poor health, factions within his party and
the devastating blow of the Wuhan Virus are all taking a toll on his
ability to lead the country as he was doing before.
It is still not clear why Oli took such a risk - Was it to consolidate
his own position in the midst of the pandemic when the country is in
disarray or did he feel threatened about his own leadership in the
Government and the Party? At any rate one cannot but agree with Siddhi
B. Ranjitkar of Kathmandu Metro that Oli’s Act was like that of the
famous mythical character Bhasmusara who ended up hurting himself in the
process in his attempt to destroy everyone else!
This drama concerns two ordinances- one related to the political parties and the other on the Constitution Council.
The ordinance on the political parties sought to ease the process of
splitting and forming of a new political party by allowing 40 percent of
either the Central Committee or that of the Parliamentary members to
take such a decision. Earlier both would be necessary for the formation
of a new party.
The second one related to the functioning of the Constitutional Council
which consists of six members namely, the PM in the chair, with the
Chief Justice, Speaker, Deputy Speaker, Chairman of the National
Assembly and the Leader of the Opposition. The Council makes
appointments to Constitutional bodies like the Commission of
Investigation of Abuse of authority, National Human Rights Commission
and even Ambassadorial appointments. It is a powerful one. The earlier
provision was that the appointments should be unanimous and the present
ordinance sought to make it easier by accepting decisions by a simple
majority.
The ordinances were approved by the President on 20th of April with
great alacrity without raising any objection or query and were also
approved to be withdrawn with the same alacrity on the recommendation of
the Cabinet on the 24th. This five-day drama was totally unnecessary
and only showed Oli’s desperation in the present political context in
Nepal.
The one on the party split was triggered by an imminent split in the
Samajbadi party that had seventeen members in the Parliament. One Renu
Yadhav of SP along with five others were already in Kathmandu to prepare
for the split and one other MP Surendra Yadav was allegedly (forced?)
brought to the Capital overnight to join the group to proceed with the
split. It is alleged that the “kidnapping” of the MP from Janakpur was
with the approval of PM Oli.
To frustrate the split, the leaders of the Samajbadi Party led by
Baburam Bhattarai smartly moved and moved quickly to merge the party
with the RJP just hours before the split. The RJP had 16 MPs and the SP
17 MPs and the Renu Yadav and company could not have made forty percent
in the merged party of 33 MPS!
The question is- Why did Oli try to split the SP? Was it to move for
Constitutional Amendments which would need the support of either the SP
or the RJP. Certainly not as Oli from the beginning had no intention of
moving for Constitutional amendments to satisfy the demand of the
Madhesi Groups. The Madhesi Groups both the SP and the RJP and more
particularly the former, foolishly believed that Oli was sincere only to
be disappointed finally! Its Chief Upendra Yadav was happy with his
ceremonial post of Deputy Prime Minister and could not care less about
justice to the Madhesis.
In the NCP, it is estimated roughly that 121 Mps belong to the former
UML and 53 belong to the former Maoist Party. One reason given is that
if the Maoist faction was to leave the Ruling party, Oli would need the
support of other minor parties for a simple majority to continue and
hence his desperate bid to get a new party to split out of the existing
two Terain Parties. But this does not fully explain this foolish move as
there was no immediate danger of a split within the Ruling Party. There
is also a presumption here that other leaders like Madhav Nepal and Bam
Dev Gautham of former UML would stick with Oli. This may not happen.
It is said that the Party Secretariat consisting of nine members first
met and discussed about the ordinance. Dahal was of the view that the
ordinances should be withdrawn. Oli was defiant and had said that the
ordinances have already been approved by the President. Later in the
day, six of the members of the Secretarial separately met at Bam Dev
Gautham’s residence to discuss the developments and demand a meeting of
the Standing Committee to discuss the issue. This perhaps unnerved Oli
to quickly withdraw the ordinances.
The other ordinance on Constitutional Council was necessitated by the
fact that the Opposition leader Sher Bahadur Deuba never agreed to any
of the suggestions of the Government in the Council and many
Constitutional posts remained vacant due to differences and lack of
unanimity. In fact it is said that Deuba never approved any of the
suggested appointments. The Ordinance was supposed to remove this
impediment by letting the decisions to be accepted by a simple majority
and not by all unanimously as was required now.
Oli has learnt a lesson but it is doubtful whether he would give up his
penchant for taking unilateral decisions without consulting his senior
colleagues! After the drama of the two ordinances, it could be safely
said that the once dominant position of Oli both within the Government
and the Party is getting shaky.