Living With Covid: Recover Better – Stand Up For Human Rights

By Asanka Aberathne –DECEMBER 10, 2020

Asanka Abeyrathna

On 10th December, every year, International Human Rights Day is annually celebrated in United Nations countries across the world. The General Assembly of the UN adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. It was a significant milestone that declared the universal and inalienable rights based on human being and dignity. The preamble of the UDHR has mentioned that “Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. It emphasizes on being regardless of race, colour, religion, sex, language, political, nation, wealth or property, birth, etc. when finding solutions to this crisis. However, at this moment, unfortunately, millions of people are still struggling in day-to-day life with COVID-19 pandemic. This year’s Human Rights Day theme is “Recover Better – Stand up for Human Rights”. The theme directly addresses the COVID-19 pandemic and tries to recover better from the global crisis with ensuring human rights. Although universality and inalienability are key principles of human rights, the international human rights law considers that human rights can be limited in an emergency. With the various religious leanings in Asian society that always emphasizes the citizen’s duties and responsibilities but these yet not give priority on the citizen’s rights. On the other hand, many orient countries view human rights as a western concept, but the new approach seems quite different from the traditional thinking of human rights. We must approach this crisis considering human rights that are critical for the response and better recovery. If we react to this crisis neglecting human rights and freedom the consequences will become dangerous to the justice, peace and livelihood of the general public. Therefore, this article is an attempt to describe the importance of utilizing human rights based approach in seeking a solution to recover better and soon form the crisis.

The threat is the virus, not the people

The legal and political process must not be a threat to human rights in response to the pandemic. But some narratives of the authorities in reporting on the infected are absolutely in stark contrast to human dignity. “Trapping the infected” with camera crews surrounding them as media cover the stories is cold damage to privacy and dignity of the patients. An infected is a person in need of emergency medical treatments and help, not a criminal. Total disregard of humanity and dignity in media coverage is always dangerous. It becomes a scar to the character of the infected when treated as an enemy or threat to community health. Hate speech is the root cause of people trying to hide the disease and causing further spreading of the virus. Physicians and health specialists with experience in epidemiology are capable of controlling the virus. The political authority is responsible for providing the facilities and empowering the health sector to control the pandemic. Instead, we see General Shavendra Silva running the campaign front for the new government as the head of the National Operations Center for the Prevention of Coronavirus Outbreak. Thus, the government is alienating health professionals from providing precise information to the general public and is elaborating the solution of the pandemic to be a military mission.

Harmful laws and constraints help the virus to propagate

Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, every country in the world is now party to at least one human rights treaty that addresses health and patient rights. Yet, harmful laws, policies, and practices routinely interfere with access to health care and increase vulnerability to ill health, particularly for poor, marginalized, or criminalized populations. The most crucial thing in day-to-day life is for people to manage their health and self-sanitation without falling into poverty. Just need to provide them access to health services, but many countries are still following harmful health policies. Violation of some health rights may end in death. Ensuring the health rights of every individual in society has become a must, especially in controlling the spread of the virus. The right to health is to recognize the right to live. No matter how dangerous the pandemic is, being free from the arbitrary arrests and detention, fair trial and protection of privacy must be ensured. Emergencies were declared in many countries without a minimum monitoring period. 

According to the ‘Pandemic and Human Rights’ report of the UN, “the public health crisis is rapidly becoming an economic and social crisis, and the health and human rights crisis is not two but one”. More than 2.2 billion people worldwide are insecure without even the minimum sanitation. Regular hand wash for this 2.2 billion people is not an option where water facilities are insufficient. Keeping the one-meter social distance is not a practical thing for the 1.8 million people because they live in densely populated housing schemes or flats. The homeless community quickly becomes infected with the virus. Without clean water and basic sanitation, the lives of slum dwellers are at high risk as they have no access to frequent hand washing and self-quarantine facilities. However, the virus propagates rapidly in the presence of poverty. 

Drones can search for us, but it’s useless in controlling the virus

High-tech flying cameras used by the security forces can easily capture the behavior of people even in the dark. Violations of human rights and fundamental freedom and privacy during the pandemic have increased due to the widespread use of drones in China. Military regimes have used online drone technology to restrict individual freedom, to warn and even in punishing. In Sri Lanka, the government’s use of high-tech flying cameras in lockdown areas in response to the pandemic is a blatant violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Army drones monitor the human behavior in the lockdown areas but it does not carry first-aid to people suffering from ill-health. Government flying cameras violate the privacy of self-quarantining individuals and have carelessly failed to facilitate them with medicinal needs. But these drones have proven to work well in isolating the victims from their human rights. Even during the big lockdown, the government issued utility bills, credit bills with taking no regard to providing essential food and medicine in most parts of the country. Thus, flying cameras are not an effective solution for the virus.

Read More