EU Parliament Calls For Suspension Of GSP+ As Noose Tightens Internationally On Gota Regime 

Gotabaya

JUNE 10, 2021

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Thursday (10) that puts Sri Lanka’s trade concessions for imports to the European Union – the country’s second biggest export market – in grave peril.

In its resolution adopted by 628 votes in favour in the 705-member legislative assembly of the regional grouping, the EU Parliament called on the EU Commission to consider “temporary withdrawal” of Sri Lanka’s preferential access to European markets, which cuts trade tariffs significantly for Sri Lankan exports, including apparel, ceramic and rubber.

In the resolution adopted on Thursday, the EU Parliament noted that Sri Lanka had regained access to the GSP+ Scheme in 2017 on the explicit condition that it would repeal or replace draconian anti-terror laws – the Prevention of Terrorism Act – and implement human rights reform.

The Sri Lankan Government had persistently failed to meet those conditions the Resolution noted, calling on the EU and the European External Action Service to report to Parliament on Sri Lanka’s compliance on human rights issues and consider suspension of the GSP+ concessions.

The EU Parliament noted that in March 2021, the Government of Sri Lanka had expanded the PTA and allowed for two years of detention without trial for detainees causing religious, racial, or communal disharmony.” The PTA had been systematically used for arbitrary arrests and the detention of Muslims and minority groups, including Ahnaf Jazeem, a 26 year old Muslim teacher and poet and Hejaaz Hizbullah, a well known lawyer for minority rights and the rule of law.

The EU Parliament “noted with concern” the detention of former CID Director Shani Abeysekera, and urged the Government to immediately give those detained a fair trial on valid charges or release them unconditionally.

The Resolution also noted the adoption of the 20th Amendment to the Constitution and expressed serious concern about the resulting decline in judicial independence, reduction of parliamentary control and excessive accumulation of power in the presidency.

The EU Resolution is a clear indication that international pressure on Sri Lanka’s human rights record will not be confined to the UNHRC session in Geneva three times a year, and will likely be expanded with more bilaterally targeted actions.

In March this year, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet, specifically called on individual member states to consider targeted sanctions, travel bans and other bilateral measures to hold Sri Lankan Government officials to account. A withdrawal of the GSP+ and even a suspension of the preferential tariffs will cause further economic strain for exporters that bring crucial foreign revenue to Sri Lanka’s strained national coffers.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s Government has promised the EU that it will “revisit” the PTA. However a few days ago, the President issued a gazette declaring a previous counter terrorism unit HQ as a special detention centre for PTA detainees, a clear indication that more arrests under the draconian anti-terror legislation were coming.

The EU Parliament resolution was adopted even as the US Congress considers a resolution on Sri Lanka on its rights record and power sharing with the island’s minority Tamils.

Read the full Resolution adopted by the European Parliament here or see full text as follows:

====================================================

European Parliament 

2019-2024

TEXTS ADOPTED 

P9_TA(2021)0290 

The situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of  Terrorism Act  

European Parliament resolution of 10 June 2021 on the situation in Sri Lanka, in  particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (2021/2748(RSP)) 

The European Parliament,

– having regard to its previous resolutions on Sri Lanka,

– having regard to the report of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights  of 9 February 2021 entitled ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in  Sri Lanka’,

– having regard to the UN Human Rights Council resolution of 23 March 2021 entitled  ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka’,

– having regard to Regulations No. 01 of 2021 published on 12 March 2021 under Sri  Lanka’s Prevention of Terrorism Act,

– having regard to the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection  of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism of  14 December 2018 entitled ‘Visit to Sri Lanka’,

– having regard to the statement by Michelle Bachelet, the UN High Commissioner for  Human Rights, of 24 February 2021 on Sri Lanka,

– having regard to the final report of January 2020 of the European Union Election  Observation Mission to the Sri Lanka Presidential Election of 16 November 2019,

– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, – having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966,

– having regard to the EU Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+), the special  incentive programme of which Sri Lanka is a beneficiary,

– having regard to Rule 144(5) and 132(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

1. whereas Sri Lanka has been marred by a decades-long civil war which ended in 2009,  during which serious human rights violations were committed by both sides;
2. whereas the human rights situation in Sri Lanka has been steadily deteriorating, with the  new government rapidly backtracking on the limited progress achieved under previous  administrations; whereas the space in which civil society and an independent media can  operate in the country is rapidly shrinking;
3. whereas the controversial Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) has been in place in Sri  Lanka since 1979 and grants the police broad powers to search, arrest and detain civilian  suspects; whereas the wide-ranging powers provided for in the PTA have led to consistent  and well-founded allegations of torture and sexual abuse, forced confessions and  systematic denials of due process;
4. whereas in her most recent report on Sri Lanka, the UN High Commissioner for Human  Rights reiterated the calls for a moratorium on the use of the PTA for new arrests until it is  replaced by legislation that adheres to international best practices;
5. whereas the Government of Sri Lanka issued Regulations No. 01 of 2021 on 9 March  2021, expanding the PTA and, inter alia, allowing for two years of detention without trial  for causing ‘religious, racial, or communal disharmony’;
6. whereas the PTA has been systematically used for arbitrary arrests and the detention of  Muslims and minority groups in Sri Lanka, including Ahnaf Jazeem, a 26-year-old  Muslim teacher and poet, and Hejaaz Hizbullah, a well-known lawyer for minority rights  and the rule of law;
7. whereas on 19 May 2017 Sri Lanka regained access to generous tariff preferences under  the GSP+, on the condition that it replaces its PTA and effectively implements 27  international conventions, including human rights conventions; whereas the European  Union has repeatedly expressed concern over the PTA and noted Sri Lanka’s failure to  repeal the act despite its commitment to doing so;
8. whereas on 20 October 2020 the Sri Lankan Parliament passed the 20th Amendment to  the Constitution, reinforcing the executive presidency;
9. whereas nearly 12 years on from the end of the war, domestic initiatives for accountability  and reconciliation have repeatedly failed to produce results, thus more deeply entrenching  impunity and exacerbating victims’ distrust in the system;
10. whereas there are clear signs of the accelerating militarisation of civilian government  functions in Sri Lanka; whereas since 2020, at least 28 serving or former military and  intelligence personnel were appointed to key administrative posts; whereas those  appointments include at least two senior military officials who were implicated in UN  reports in alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the final years of the  conflict; whereas many suspects in police custody as well as inmates in Sri Lankan prison  complexes have been killed; whereas the most recent cases include deaths in police  custody in May 2021; whereas 11 inmates at Mahara prison were killed and 117 others  injured when guards opened fire to control a riot over COVID-19 conditions in November  2020;
11. whereas authorities in Sri Lanka handed down capital punishment sentences for drug related offences in 2019, despite the existence of a moratorium on the use of capital  punishment in the country since 1976;
12. Expresses deep concern over Sri Lanka’s alarming path towards the recurrence of grave  human rights violations as described by the most recent UN report on the country, which  lists among the early warning signs the accelerating militarisation of civilian  governmental functions, the reversal of important constitutional safeguards, political  obstruction of accountability, exclusionary rhetoric, intimidation of civil society, and the  use of anti-terrorism laws;
13. Reiterates its strong opposition to the continued application of the current PTA; calls on  the Sri Lankan authorities to fulfil their pledge to review and repeal the act and replace it  with anti-terrorism legislation which adheres to international best practices; further calls  for the immediate suspension of the deradicalisation regulations;
14. Points out that Regulations No. 01 of 2021 do not provide for procedural guarantees for  any person deprived of their liberty as laid down in Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and that they violate Sri Lanka’s own constitutional  guarantees under Article 13 of the Sri Lankan Constitution; recalls that deradicalisation, rehabilitation and reintegration centres, which are regulated under similar legislation, have  in the past been rife with serious human rights violations such as torture and other ill treatment, including sexual and gender-based violence;
15. Expresses grave concern about the arbitrary arrests and detention under the PTA without  due process and access to justice, including for civil society activists, lawyers, writers and  poets such as Hejaaz Hizbullah and Ahnaf Jazeem; notes with concern the detention of  Shani Abeysekara, the former director of the Criminal Investigation Department; urges the  Government of Sri Lanka to immediately give those detained a fair trial on valid charges and, if there are no charges, to release them unconditionally;
16. Deplores the continuing discrimination against and violence towards religious and ethnic  minorities and communities in Sri Lanka, including Muslims, Hindus, Tamils and  Christians; calls on the Government of Sri Lanka to unequivocally condemn hate speech,  incitement to violence and discrimination against religious and ethnic groups in the country, and to hold to account those who advance such divisions, including within the  government and military;
17. Notes the adoption of the 20th Amendment to the Constitution and expresses serious concern about the resulting decline in judiciary independence, the reduction of  parliamentary control, and the excessive accumulation of power with the presidency;
18. Notes with concern the Government of Sri Lanka’s recent proposal to enact a new law on  disinformation despite concerns raised by civil society organisations about the threats such  a law could pose to the freedom of expression; urges online platforms to take proactive steps to moderate the circulation of hate speech and disinformation online in the Sinhalese  and Tamil languages;
19. Is concerned that provisions in Sri Lanka’s Penal Code, notably sections 365, 365A and 399, have been interpreted in such a way as to criminalise individuals with diverse sexual  orientations and gender identities;
20. Calls on the Commission to urgently evaluate its funding for the UN Office on Drugs and Crime and INTERPOL project ‘Support to Sri Lanka on Counter-Terrorism’ while counterterrorism in Sri Lanka is in certain cases being used as a pretext on which to

persecute members of ethnic and religious groups and civil society, including human rights defenders; calls on the EU Delegation to Sri Lanka and the Member States’ representations to increase their support to civil society, especially human rights defenders, environmental defenders and journalists;

10. Underlines the crucial importance of ensuring that the national reconciliation process is  given the necessary attention and results in concrete actions, including accountability for enforced disappearances and past crimes; regrets Sri Lanka’s withdrawal from the  commitments it made to the UN Human Rights Council in the context of its sponsorship  of resolution of 14 October 2015 entitled ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and  human rights in Sri Lanka’, and encourages it to re-engage with the council, which is  instrumental in restoring relations with the international community and creating a process  of national reconciliation between the diverse Sinhalese, Tamil, Muslim, Hindu and  Christian communities;
11. Calls on the Government of Sri Lanka to prevent any hindrance of the investigation and  possible prosecution of members of the security forces accused of serious human rights  abuses; insists that an investigation be carried out into allegations of grave human rights  abuses and war crimes committed during the civil war by senior figures from all sides;  asks the Government of Sri Lanka to end the practice of appointing current and former  military commanders implicated in serious abuses to senior government positions;
12. Calls for a rigorous, impartial and complete investigation into the 2019 Easter Sunday  bombings in line with international legal standards; calls, furthermore, for those against  whom there is evidence of culpability to promptly be brought to trial, and for those for  whom there is insufficient evidence to be released;
13. Recalls that the GSP+ scheme offers the incentive of better access to the EU market for  the country’s exporters, in return for further progress in fully implementing those  conventions; recalls that one of Sri Lanka’s key commitments was to fully align its  counterterrorism legislation with international human rights conventions in order to secure  a favourable trading relationship under the GSP+; recalls the consequences foreseen in the  GSP Regulation1in the event of a persistent failure to adopt and enact the necessary  human rights reforms, repeal abusive legislation and reverse the current trajectory of  increasing violations;
14. Underlines that the GSP+ scheme offered to Sri Lanka has made a significant contribution  to the country’s economy, from which exports to the EU have increased to EUR 2.3  billion, making the EU Sri Lanka’s second-largest export market; highlights the ongoing  monitoring of Sri Lanka’s eligibility for GSP+ status and stresses that the continuance of  GSP+ trade preferences is not automatic; calls on the Commission and the European  External Action Service (EEAS) to take into due account current events when assessing  Sri Lanka’s eligibility for GSP+ status; further calls on the Commission and the EEAS to  use the GSP+ as a leverage to push for advancement on Sri Lanka’s human rights  obligations and demand the repeal or replacement of the PTA, to carefully assess whether  there is sufficient reason, as a last resort, to initiate a procedure for the temporary

Read More