A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Saturday, October 28, 2017
Decline of Buddhism: Can it be stopped?

Many ‘false’ Dhammas are emerging which has become a major threat. Buddha encouraged discussion and discourse but what is happening now is Bhikkus giving their own interpretations to gather a set of followers.
( October 28, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Impermanence
is a quality of all things, preached the Buddha. Therefore, His
teachings cannot be an exception to this law of nature, one can argue.
But, on the other hand, the real crux of Buddha Dhamma are universal
truths and how can universal truths decline or disappear? May be,
Buddhism as a religion, may decline and disappear but the substance, at
least a large part of it, will survive for the foreseeable future.
Perhaps, my title should have been ‘Decline of Buddha Dhamma’ than
Buddhism. In fact, some may welcome the decline of Buddhism so that
rituals are replaced by true practices.
Some believe we are in a ‘terminal era’ where the gradual decline of
Buddhism with ultimate demise, is inevitable. They also believe that
Buddhism, then, will be non-existent for eons, till the birth of the
next Buddha, Maithri. These concepts of previous Buddhas and a future
Buddha are scientifically implausible and can only be believed with
blind faith. To me, Gautama Buddha is a unique human being who, by the
exploration of mind, discovered universal truths. By implying He is one
of a cycle of Buddhas, all born in India, diminishes his unparalleled
achievements. He was the originator of scientific thinking as
exemplified by what he preached in Kalama Suttta but I will not go into
details as much has been written on this Sutta. However, there is
another Sutta, Kevaddha Sutta, that illustrates how important education
is; leading to the avoidance of acceptance without questioning.
When Kevaddha, an ordinary householder in Nalanda, approached the Buddha
and requested him to get one of the monks to perform miracles so that
the people of Nalanda, a powerful and prosperous kingdom, would have
greater faith in the Buddha, He replied: “Kevatta, there are these three
miracles that I have declared, having directly known and realized them
for myself. Which three? The miracle of psychic power, the miracle of
telepathy, and the miracle of instruction.”
The Buddha went on to explain that psychic power may convince the
believers but non-believer would say ‘There is already a charm, called
Ghandari charm, used by many priests to exhibit psychic phenomena’.
Similarly, non-believers of telepathy would say that many priests
already use a charm called Manika. Seeing these drawbacks, I am
disillusioned with these miracles and believe only in the miracle of
instructions; instructing how to use the mind properly and goes on to
explain how instruction can lead to enlightenment. Therefore, He called
instructions the greatest miracle; instructions not to follow Him
blindly but use the mind properly to achieve enlightenment.
While claiming to follow the teachings of such a rational teacher, we
believe in the irrational. The occult attracts us and there are many
Buddhist priests engaging in activities which the Buddha categorised as
practices unworthy of a monk. Though we think ‘Mitya Distika’, (wrong
believers) refers to those of other faiths, a surprisingly large number
of Buddhists are wrong believers; believing in distorted versions of
Buddhism.
Many have argued how long the Buddha Dhamma would last but this seems an
exercise in futility and, instead, we should be concentrating on the
question, whether there is a threat to the Dhamma and, more importantly,
whether we can take corrective action. According to most authorities,
the dangers are twofold; external and internal.
External threats
Early writers identified two external threats:
1. Invasion of India from the North West, which did occur but it did not affect Buddhism alone.
2. Regulation of Monks by rulers, which also did occur but more important was the withdrawal of facilities granted.
2. Regulation of Monks by rulers, which also did occur but more important was the withdrawal of facilities granted.
As far as I can see, the greatest threat, a very successful one at that,
came from the Brahmins. Had the words of equality of the Buddha spread
far and wise, fearing they would lose their claimed superiority based on
an archaic system of caste, Brahmins conceived a cunning plan. They
‘swallowed’ the Buddha as the ninth avatar of Vishnu. Gradually their
concepts crept into Buddhism and that is the Buddhism we practice today.
Internal threats
These are the reasons recorded by various writers and some are
definitely stated in Suttas like Saddhammasamosa and Saddhammapatirupaka
Sutta.
1. Admission of women to the monastic community
2. Lack of respect toward various elements of the Buddhist tradition
3. Lack of diligence in meditation practice
4. Carelessness in the transmission of the teachings
5. The emergence of divisions within the Sangha
6. The emergence of a false or ‘counterfeit’ Dhamma
7. Excessive association with secular society
2. Lack of respect toward various elements of the Buddhist tradition
3. Lack of diligence in meditation practice
4. Carelessness in the transmission of the teachings
5. The emergence of divisions within the Sangha
6. The emergence of a false or ‘counterfeit’ Dhamma
7. Excessive association with secular society
Admission of women to the monastic tradition would lead to the halving
of the lifespan of Buddha Sasana, the Buddha is supposed to have said
and at the first Sangayana, Venerable Ananda was blamed by the assembled
Arahants for enticing the Buddha to do this. Are we to believe that
Ananda, who had not even got to the first step of enlightenment, could
convince the Buddha? Are we to believe that Ananda was needed to remind
the Buddha, who breast-fed him following the death of his mother? Are we
to believe that the Buddha who preached equality was reluctant to grant
equality to women for ordination? This seems an addition by Monks as an
act of self-preservation. It is interesting to speculate whether the
un-Buddhists behaviour of some monks would be diminished if we had a
strong Bhikkuni Sasana. Anyway, it is women who protect the Sasana;
obvious when you look at the crowds in any Buddhist religious ceremony
where the vast majority are women.
Regarding the second, in Saddhammapatirupaka Sutta, the Buddha has
stated that when the Sangha and laity, live without respect, without
deference for the Teacher, for the Dhamma, for the Sangha, for the
training and for the concentration, it lends to the disappearance of the
Dhamma but has also said that reversal of these will ensure the
protection of the Dhamma.
Lack of diligence in Meditation practice is very common as even Monks
believe it is a practice for those of the monastic tradition.
Fortunately, scientists have recognised the value of Mindfulness
Meditation, introduced by the Buddha, and treatment modalities based on
this are now in common use. Unfortunately, attempts by some to
commercialise is bringing disrepute but this is likely to be temporary.
Regarding carelessness in the transmission of teachings, in Pathama
Saddhmmasammosa Sutta, (as translated by E M Hare and appearing in
obo.genaud.net/dhamma-vinaya) it is stated:
Herein, monks, carelessly the monks hear Dhamma;carelessly they master
it;carelessly they bear it in mind;carelessly they test the good of the
things borne in mind;knowing the good and knowing Dhamma,carelessly they
go their ways in Dhamma by Dhamma.
Verily, monks, these are the five thingsthat lead to the confounding, the disappearance of Saddhamma.’
I referred to the divisions of Sangha in my article ‘Men in Robes’
(SATmag, 14 October) and am pleased to note that the Malwatta Chapter is
already taking action on some of these misdeeds. Hope all three Nikayas
will unite to take stern action against Bhikkus indulging in
un-Buddhist activities.
Many ‘false’ Dhammas are emerging which has become a major threat.
Buddha encouraged discussion and discourse but what is happening now is
Bhikkus giving their own interpretations to gather a set of followers.
Though not a Bhikku, the downfall of the Tibetan teacher Rinpoche, which
I referred to in the same article, highlighted this problem.
Excessive association with secular society is interpreted by some as
Monks indulging in non-religious activities but if Monks take part in
activities for the common good, not their personal benefit, what harm is
there?
It looks as if we, Buddhists, need to urge our Monks to listen to the
words of the Buddha and change some of their ways so that Buddha Dhamma
lasts for years to come. Even if Buddhism is in decline, even if actions
that can reverse this is not taken, it is gratifying to note that some
of the concepts the Buddha introduced, like Mindfulness is in the
ascendency. Its application, albeit with modifications, are benefitting
vast numbers of people of all races and religions all over the world.