A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, July 31, 2018
Julian Assange and the betrayal of Latin America’s “left”
Assange was granted asylum by the previous Ecuadorian government of President Rafael Correa in 2012 because of the clear evidence that he faced political persecution for exposing crimes.
( July 29, 2018, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian) Lenín
Moreno, the president of Ecuador, made it clear on Friday that his
government is actively negotiating the handover of WikiLeaks founder
Julian Assange to the British authorities, whose police are waiting
outside the Ecuadorian embassy to grab him the moment he sets foot on
the London sidewalk.
If he were to fall into the clutches of the British authorities, he
would be subjected to lengthy imprisonment pending extradition to the
US, where he could face life imprisonment or even the death penalty on
espionage and conspiracy charges.
Moreno, who is conducting a European tour seeking to ingratiate himself
and his government with the major imperialist powers, went out of his
way on Friday to vilify Assange.
“I’ve never agreed with the activity Mr. Assange performs,” Moreno said.
“I’ve never agreed with the intervention in people’s emails to obtain
information despite how valuable it is to shed light on some undesirable
acts by governments and people… There are correct and legal ways to
it.”
Previously, Moreno called Assange a “hacker,” an “inherited problem” and a “stone in our shoe.”
There is no evidence whatsoever that Assange or WikiLeaks hacked into
anyone’s emails or violated any law, for that matter. Assange has
carried out invaluable work as a courageous and resourceful journalist,
making available to the people of the world information kept secret from
them about imperialist war crimes, mass surveillance and
anti-democratic machinations and conspiracies carried out by Washington
and other governments and transnational corporations.
Assange was granted asylum by the previous Ecuadorian government of
President Rafael Correa in 2012 because of the clear evidence that he
faced political persecution for exposing these crimes.
Announcing Quito’s decision to grant Assange asylum, Ecuador’s foreign
affairs minister, Ricardo Patino, had declared that Washington’s
retaliation for Assange’s exposures “could endanger his safety,
integrity and even his life.” Patino added, “The evidence shows that if
Mr. Assange is extradited to the United States, he wouldn’t have a fair
trial. It is not at all improbable he could be subjected to cruel and
degrading treatment and sentenced to life imprisonment or even capital
punishment.”
What has changed since then? Assange has spent the past six years
trapped in the Ecuadorian embassy. The Trump administration has only
made US intentions more explicit, with former CIA Director and current
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declaring WikiLeaks a “non-state hostile
intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia,” and
proclaiming that its reporting is not protected by the First Amendment
to the US Constitution.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions has insisted that bringing Assange to the
US in chains to face a rigged prosecution is a “priority” for the US
Justice Department.
In his statement on Friday, Ecuadorian President Moreno said: “The only
thing we want is a guarantee that his life will not be in danger. We
have spoken to, and, of course, we are dealing with this with Mr.
Assange’s legal team and with the British government.”
It would appear that the only condition being laid down by the
Ecuadorian government in return for withdrawing Assange’s asylum and
handing him over to his persecutors is a worthless promise from the
British and US authorities that Assange will not be executed. The other
threats to Assange cited by the Ecuadorian authorities in 2012,
including “cruel and degrading treatment” and “life imprisonment,” are
apparently now acceptable.
In addition to his talks with the British government, Moreno has visited
Spain, signing a security agreement with the right-wing Socialist
Workers’ Party (PSOE) minority government led by Pedro Sánchez, while
guaranteeing Spanish capitalists unfettered access to Ecuador’s markets,
resources and cheap labor.
It was reportedly Spain’s protests over Assange’s condemnation of Madrid
for the arrest of former Catalonian regional President Carles
Puigdemont that led the Moreno government to cut off Assange’s access to
the Internet and prevent him from receiving phone calls or visitors,
reducing him to a state of incommunicado detention with fewer rights
than a prisoner.
What is involved here is a sharp turn to the right, not only by the
government of Lenín Moreno, but by all of the governments of Latin
America’s so-called Pink Tide and their pseudo-left satellites.
Moreno is the hand-picked successor to former president Rafael Correa,
who proclaimed himself a partisan of the “Bolivarian Revolution” of
Venezuela’s late Hugo Chávez. While Moreno and Correa have had a bitter
falling out, the right-wing policies of rapprochement with imperialism
and escalating attacks on the working class were initiated under Correa,
whose government was the first to cut off Assange’s Internet access in
retaliation for WikiLeaks’ publication of emails exposing the Democratic
Party’s rigging of the 2016 primary campaign to assure the victory of
Hillary Clinton and defeat of Bernie Sanders.
Meanwhile, other governments identified with the so-called “turn to the
left” in Latin America have been thoroughly discredited. Chávez’s
successor, Nicolás Maduro, has placed the full burden of Venezuela’s
desperate economic crisis onto the backs of the working class, while
assuring the wealth and privileges of the country’s oligarchs and
military commanders, as well as the debt payments to the international
banks.
Nicaragua’s Sandinista President Daniel Ortega has unleashed a bloodbath
to crush popular protests against austerity measures, resulting in over
400 deaths. And in Brazil, Lula, the former president of the Workers’
Party (PT), is in jail, while the PT has been thoroughly discredited by
its own antidemocratic measures and attacks on workers’ rights, opening
the path to the most right-wing government since the military
dictatorship and to the openly fascistic candidate Jair Bolsonaro.
The Latin American pseudo-left—dominated by petty-bourgeois nationalism
and oriented to the national labor bureaucracies, the pursuit of
parliamentary posts and adaptation to identity politics—has largely
ignored the attacks on Assange, refusing to lift a finger in his defense
and failing to inform Latin American workers of the decisive democratic
and social interests that are bound up with his fate.
Typical is the reaction—or, more accurately, lack of reaction—of the
main pseudo-left parties in Argentina, the PTS (Partido de los
Trabajadores Socialistas) and the PO (Partido Obrero), which, whatever
their differences, are united in an unprincipled electoral “Front of the
Left and the Workers” (FIT).
The last major article on Assange posted on the PTS’s website, Izquierda
Diario, was on April 3, 2017. It proclaimed in its headline: “With the
victory of Lenín Moreno, Julian Assange has avoided his expulsion from
the Ecuadorian embassy.” Sowing illusions in the right-wing bourgeois
politician Moreno and complacency about the dangers posed to Assange,
the PTS actually undermined the defense of the WikiLeaks editor.
As for the PO, it has completely ignored the question of Assange,
writing nothing about his case for more than five years. This party,
oriented toward an alliance with the Peronist union bureaucracy at home
and the extreme right-wing forces of Russian Stalinism abroad,
exemplifies the reactionary outlook of Latin American petty-bourgeois
nationalism, which in the Assange case, as on every other major
political question, serves as conduit for imperialist pressure upon the
working class.
The task of defending Julian Assange—and more broadly the defense of the
social and democratic rights of working people, together with the
liberation of Latin America from imperialist oppression, social
inequality and poverty—can be achieved only through the political
mobilization of the working class independently of all of the supposedly
“left” bourgeois parties and the petty-bourgeois pseudo-left groups
that support them.
The working class constitutes the only genuine constituency for the
defense of democratic rights, which can be secured only as part of the
fight to unite workers internationally to put an end to the capitalist
system, which threatens humanity with world war and dictatorship.
Latin American workers must join ranks with workers all over the world
in coming to the defense of Assange, demanding that the government of
Ecuador halt its reactionary bid to rescind his asylum, fighting for his
immediate freedom from persecution by US and British authorities and
preparing mass protests and strikes against any attempt to arrest or
extradite him. ( WSWS)