A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Friday, February 1, 2019
The Kiralagala Affair: A Lesson On Basic Logic
The
holy site was apparently unmarked. No signs indicating an ancient
religious site, were to be seen in the vicinity. In addition, people had
in the past taken pictures standing on it. Yet, when it was brought to
the attention of the Horowopathana police that seven South Eastern
University students had taken pictures, while standing on the Kiralagala
sthupa they were apprehended and remanded with a sensational news story
to supplement the whole drama.
Fair enough. Those who intentionally revile a religious site need to
make amends by going through the systematic process of law and order,
for treating such an act with indifference may have grave consequences
for the society at large.
However, justice is not to apprehend civilians for merely climbing atop
an ancient ruin, which is claimed to be an ancient religious site;
justice is not to remand a group of students for standing on an ancient
sacred site, which apparently bore no signs or indications of its
sacredness; justice in fact is to consider the context of the incident
before randomly throwing people behind bars.
To find out whether it was justice that was truly served we need to
assess the site in which the so called abominable act took place. Was
there any indication to say that it is an ancient religious site?
Apparently NO! There are hundreds of ruins all over the island, but how
many of them are religious and thus holy? How is anyone to know if there
is nothing to indicate to distinguish the sacredness of the site? If
there’s nothing to indicate that the site is sacred, and therefore ought
to be treated with respect, what is the logic behind apprehending
someone for reviling it by standing on it?
After all every ruin are merely remains of building materials. Thus in
the absence of a sign to distinguish a sacred location, the general and
lay public will merely and naturally regard it as another ancient
building. It is the responsibility of the archeological department to
label the sacred sites. Why did they not take measures to inform the
public? Do they expect the citizens to carry a manual of all the
archeological ruins wherever they go, or to have knowledge of the
sacredness and non-sacredness of every single archeological ruin in Sri
Lanka?