A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Friday, January 31, 2020
Trump’s plan is the logical conclusion of the ‘two state’ delusion – Part 1
So the administration of US President Donald Trump finally published its “Ultimate Deal”, a document being trumpeted as a “peace plan”.
But
in reality, it is nothing of the sort. It is more like a plan for the
pacification of Palestinian resistance; a formula for the liquidation of
the Palestinian cause. A scheme to sideline the Palestinian people and
pretend that the realisation of their rights can be forever delayed.
Trump’s “Vision for Peace” would permanently trap Palestinians in bantustans, cementing Israeli apartheid.
But we will never surrender our rights and our land.
Inspired by the movement that helped end apartheid in South Africa, we call for international pressure through #BDS.
873 people are talking about this
Under the plan, the illegal Israeli colonies that scar the West Bank
will remain. Palestinians will have what the plan terms “something ‘less
than a state’”. Israel’s military dictatorship (“Israeli security
responsibility”) in the West Bank will remain. Gaza will be reconquered
by Israel’s puppet, the Palestinian Authority “or another body
acceptable to Israel”.
Refugees will not return.
In a nutshell: everything to Israel, nothing for the Palestinians.
That is why even the collaborationist Palestinian Authority has
dismissed the document as totally unworkable, with Mahmoud Abbas giving
it “a thousand noes”.
The ridiculousness of the plan is clear from the maps that form a part
of it, in annexes to the document, which Trump’s son-in-law Jared
Kushner has been pushing this week.
Despite having already made the (to many Palestinians) unacceptable
concession to give up access to life in 78 per cent of the territory of
historic Palestine back in the late 1980s, the Trump-Kushner-Netanyahu
plan demands that the Palestinians should give up yet more territory.
Around one third of the West Bank will be annexed to Israel under the
plan. But crucially, the map shows that even the scraps of land
notionally left to the Palestinians are isolated, broken, discontinuous
territories.
These tiny bits of Palestinian land on the map are akin to Indian reservations in the US, or – even more aptly – the bantustans under the late, unlamented white supremacist regime in South Africa.
Reacting to increasing international outrage at its racism and violence,
the apartheid regime’s white minority rulers concocted the bantustans –
a series of “black homelands”. These were discontinuous, isolated
statelets within South Africa, forcing black people off the vast
majority of the land in South Africa, while the majority of the land was
reserved for the minority white settler population.
The apartheid regime claimed that these powerless entities gave black
people the realisation of their self-determination, even giving some
nominal “independence” in the 70s and early 80s.
But the reality was quite the opposite. In truth, the bantustans were
corrupt, violent dictatorships, which were deliberately established as
local centres of power under the ultimate control of the regime. They
were aimed at causing infighting within the majority black population,
in order to undermine the African National Congress’s liberation
struggle.
And so it is with the PA – which is also a corrupt, violent
dictatorship, whose primary purpose is to protect Israel and undermine
the Palestinian liberation struggle.
It is precisely for this reason that some minority elements of the
global movement for Zionism – Israel’s founding settler-colonial
ideology – are critical of Trump’s plan. The supposedly liberal and
“leftist” wings of Zionism oppose the plan on a purely optical basis, not because of the fact that it undermines Palestinian human rights.
That is to say, liberal Zionists only oppose Trump’s plan because it
make them look bad. It unmasks and makes plain the shabby reality of the
way Israel, the US and the EU have for decades been trying to destroy
the Palestinian liberation movement.
The way these “great powers” have been trying to do this, is to impose
the false idea that there is a “two-state solution” to the “conflict”
between “Israel and the Palestinians”.
The map, by making clear that only tiny crumbs of land in the West Bank
will remain to the Palestinians, is too truthful in its open contempt
for and racism against Palestinians.
Kushner, while going on TV to promote the plan, has been very open in his arrogant racism against Palestinians.
In typical colonial fashion, he has claimed that Palestinians are “not
ready” to govern themselves. He has derisively talked about Palestinians
“saying they have rights” – making it very clear that this racist
American considers Palestinians as less than human, and not deserving of
equal rights to Israelis or other white people.
The silver lining to all this is that there is a kind of plain frankness
to it. It is clear to all where the explicit racists stand.
But in reality, the “liberal” and “leftist” Zionists are just as racist
against Palestinians – but they are more careful about revealing that
fact in public. They have slightly better PR.
To be continued in Part Two.