A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Friday, January 31, 2020
'We want to return': Palestinian refugees in Lebanon dismiss Trump's plan
For Palestinians in refugee camps there can be no substitute for returning to their homelandPalestinian demonstrators set an image of US President Donald Trump on fire during a protest in the Rashidiyah camp near Lebanon's southern port city of Tyre (AFP)
By Abby Sewell in Bourj al-Barajneh, Lebanon-30 January 2020
Ali al-Hajj was a child when her family was expelled from Akka, on Palestine’s northern coast, to Lebanon in 1948.
“I came when I was three years old. I want to return and my children
want to return and all of us, we all want to return to Palestine, under
the fig and olive trees, and stay on our land,” she told Middle East
Eye.
Now she, like many Palestinian refugees living in Lebanon, see the hope of return moving further out of reach.
'Our people are rooted in their rights and are holding onto the right to return'- Ahmad Sakhnini, Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine
Hajj joined other residents of the crowded Bourj al-Barajneh Palestinian
refugee camp in Beirut’s southern suburbs on Wednesday, protesting the
United States’ newly proposed plan to address the Israel-Palestine
conflict. Donald Trump’s so-called “deal of the century” falls far short
of anything acceptable for those displaced in Lebanon.
“Our people are rooted in their rights and are holding onto the right to
return, to the right of citizenship in an independent Palestinian state
with complete sovereignty and its capital in Jerusalem,” Ahmad
Sakhnini, a representative of the Democratic Front for the Liberation
of Palestine in Bourj al-Barajneh, told MEE.
The current plan, he said, does not meet those criteria: “We will not accept any other solution.”
Land swap
Unveiled by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on
Tuesday, without the participation of any Palestinians, the plan was
praised by Israeli leaders and promptly rejected by their Palestinian
counterparts.
The plan proposes that illegal Israeli settlements and the Jordan Valley
are annexed to Israel, offering a future Palestinian state a land swap
for other territory in return, and would designate Jerusalem as the
capital of Israel state, with a capital for the Palestinians on the
city’s eastern outskirts.
The state of Palestine would be demilitarised, and Israel would retain control over its borders.
As to the right of return, the plan would allow for Palestinian refugees
who have not “already resettled in a permanent location” - a condition
that has yet to be defined - to apply for resettlement in the future
Palestinian state.
But the right to return would not apply to lands within the borders of Israel, like Hajj’s family home in Akka.
There are an estimated 180,000 Palestinian refugees resident in Lebanon,
alongside some 29,000 others who have settled in the country after
fleeing the war next door in Syria.
Those wanting to return to the Palestinian state would also be subject
to vetting and potential rejection for security reasons, the plan said,
noting that “many Palestinian refugees come from war torn countries,
such as Syria and Lebanon, that are extremely hostile toward the state
of Israel”.
The document proposed that a committee of Israelis and Palestinians
should be set up to address the issue, although it was unclear exactly
what the committee’s powers would be.
The White House press office did not respond to a request for comment as
to who would have the ultimate decision-making power over resettlement
admissions.
Under the plan, those ineligible for return to Palestine might receive
compensation from a fund to be set up for the purpose and would either
be integrated in their current host countries or - for some 50,000 of
them - in Organisation of Islamic Cooperation countries that would agree to take them.
Amnesty International criticised the proposal to provide compensation in lieu of a right of return.
“Palestinians who fled or were expelled from their homes in 1948, and
their descendants, have a right to return under international law,” the
rights group wrote. “This is an individual human right which cannot be
given away as a political concession.”
Lebanese rejection
The plan also raised alarm among Lebanese officials, who saw it as a threat to force permanent settlement of the Palestinians.
The presence of the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, and the degree of
rights they should be accorded, is a perennially thorny political issue.
Palestinians in Lebanon have limited rights to work and own property.
Last year, the Palestinian camps erupted in protests after the labour
ministry launched a crackdown on businesses employing non-Lebanese
workers without work permits, ousting many Palestinians from their jobs.
But on at least one issue, the various Lebanese political factions and
the Palestinians themselves agree: refugees should be able to return to
their pre-1948 homes.
Following the US plan’s launch, Lebanese President Michel Aoun called
his counterpart at the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, and
stressed that Lebanon supports “the right of the Palestinians to return
to their lands and the establishment of their independent state with
Jerusalem as its capital”.
Nabih Berri, the speaker of parliament, issued a statement calling the
deal “a bribe to sell the rights, sovereignty, dignity, and Palestinian
Arab lands with Arab money”.
“Lebanon and the Lebanese will not be false witnesses in the new death
penalty against the Palestinian people and their legitimate rights,
including their right to return home,” he said. “We will not accept,
regardless of the conditions, to be an accomplice in the sale or
exchange of these rights.”
Meanwhile, Hassan Mneimneh, the head of the Lebanese-Palestinian
Dialogue Committee, a body set up by the government to oversee refugee
affairs, said in the statement that the proposed deal “carries the most
serious risks not only to the people and the Palestinian cause, but to
the rest of the countries and entities of the Arab region”.
In Bourj al-Barajneh, some refugees, while refusing to return to
Palestine under the current conditions, also said they do not want
Lebanese citizenship.
“In this country, we are visitors,” said Aisa Ghadban, who raised four
sons with his wife in the camp. “We don’t want to settle here or in any
other country. We want to return to our country - we want to free
Palestine and return.”
His wife, Mariam Mohammed Barazeh, added: “If we can’t return, our children will return, or our grandchildren.”
One of the youngest protesters, 11-year-old Malak Omar Steitieh, echoed their comments.
“God willing, our mothers and fathers and siblings, all of us will go back to Palestine,” she said.
“And Trump, no matter how rich he is and how much money he wants to give
us, we won’t accept it, because we are the Palestinian people and, God
willing, we will reach our dream of returning to Palestine.”